From: "Richard Purdie" <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH] package_ipk/deb/rpm: Drop recursive do_build task dependencies
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 12:03:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38ae386328c67ce4e48930950b8131d7fe2e10f4.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16A633F8E639735E.6604@lists.openembedded.org>
On Sun, 2021-09-19 at 11:57 +0100, Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
> This is a controversial change which removes the recursive dependencies
> from the do_build target of packaging tasks of recipes.
>
> Currently this means when you "bitbake <image>" or "bitbake <recipe>",
> the packaging tasks run for all packaging backends enabled for all recipes
> in the dependency chain. The same therefore then applies to images.
>
> We don't actually need that, it is a convinience thing. Removing it
> massively simplifies the task graph and causes much fewer tasks to execute
> in many common scenarios. It also means less sstate is fetched for
> example when building an image.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
> meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass | 2 --
> meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass | 2 --
> meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass | 2 --
> 3 files changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass b/meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass
> index eca43e17876..8f0eadbcd2e 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass
> @@ -320,5 +320,3 @@ addtask package_write_deb after do_packagedata do_package
>
> PACKAGEINDEXDEPS += "dpkg-native:do_populate_sysroot"
> PACKAGEINDEXDEPS += "apt-native:do_populate_sysroot"
> -
> -do_build[recrdeptask] += "do_package_write_deb"
> diff --git a/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass b/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass
> index c3b53854e8b..756744279e1 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass
> @@ -278,5 +278,3 @@ addtask package_write_ipk after do_packagedata do_package
>
> PACKAGEINDEXDEPS += "opkg-utils-native:do_populate_sysroot"
> PACKAGEINDEXDEPS += "opkg-native:do_populate_sysroot"
> -
> -do_build[recrdeptask] += "do_package_write_ipk"
> diff --git a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
> index 88d861c0e75..9f415b234de 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
> @@ -752,5 +752,3 @@ addtask package_write_rpm after do_packagedata do_package
>
> PACKAGEINDEXDEPS += "rpm-native:do_populate_sysroot"
> PACKAGEINDEXDEPS += "createrepo-c-native:do_populate_sysroot"
> -
> -do_build[recrdeptask] += "do_package_write_rpm"
Just to add a bit more context to this, the bigger impact will be on CI setups
including our autobuilder since "bitbake XXX" will no longer do quite what it
did before. I'm starting to think we should move to the new behaviour and apapt
the CI targets as/where needed.
I have a build running on the autobuilder to see what impact this has on the
automated tests. I'd welcome other people's thoughts on this.
FWIW we have removed a lot of these recursive dependencies, this one is one of
the few left on do_build but it has been left as it has the biggest user visible
impact.
Cheers,
Richard
next parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-19 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <16A633F8E639735E.6604@lists.openembedded.org>
2021-09-19 11:03 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2021-09-19 18:06 ` [OE-core] [RFC PATCH] package_ipk/deb/rpm: Drop recursive do_build task dependencies Peter Kjellerstedt
2021-09-19 18:36 ` Richard Purdie
2021-09-20 7:45 ` Quentin Schulz
2021-09-20 8:55 ` Richard Purdie
2021-09-19 10:57 Richard Purdie
2021-09-20 13:27 ` [OE-core] " Joshua Watt
2021-09-20 13:54 ` Richard Purdie
2021-09-21 14:56 ` Saul Wold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38ae386328c67ce4e48930950b8131d7fe2e10f4.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox