From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TmSgE-0005vh-2h for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 18:16:18 +0100 Received: from mail-ea0-f200.google.com ([209.85.215.200]) by mga09.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 22 Dec 2012 09:00:26 -0800 Received: by mail-ea0-f200.google.com with SMTP id j13so4708815eaa.3 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 09:01:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-received:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-gm-message-state; bh=rxkZ8WTPhwTvI/gqH8DAu62LIOVcZ0Pqk4xF+jH3hCY=; b=IUf/yFehJSopdpc8tYrRAUeL8/GFlLE9k6wqGcuIokgMFC+SDDB/9jg4A24wa4OKRz 6PeunRGV7Cb55prGqxWpOGrm0o3Ge95akIvG/j8/3eTfmqDnQHgnkKZfpp9yK5h9ly6m VEFqha2cydZ4m2jwdy1E8lpHvy+doIaEjRrSkEOsXItYMhOLIk3FB7OFyewGIpQY/Hlv APoshBWP9MXgyJ+vGg/29+i1TJph7KTckpwAxwE/wBHLdj9aaRYTFwctyuUt9iyOJTi4 f1UGpq6vnPJl8KkjTKUcRgmbZQ5lANHDhyMAh5/8MQCYtMSnhz8w1Os1UOa/8vQXV0pc +3+w== X-Received: by 10.181.13.75 with SMTP id ew11mr28522733wid.9.1356195679078; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 09:01:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.181.13.75 with SMTP id ew11mr28522722wid.9.1356195678959; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 09:01:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.13] (35.106.2.81.in-addr.arpa. [81.2.106.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p3sm35028068wic.8.2012.12.22.09.01.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 22 Dec 2012 09:01:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:01:20 +0000 From: Ross Burton To: Otavio Salvador Message-ID: <3A52198641724EB2A46E018E68766013@intel.com> In-Reply-To: References: <50D38B3E.30003@linux.intel.com> <50D42D58.4010703@intel.com> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmuweHxqEGega7x1mygz26aHNllaTKDAAbDmg1hiLB+XbAyr4crT/roOYerR7oqCh9nR3B7gsEN07p/PWo7zSoJfo6T1g5Nkz/Qs/7M8cp0b6uULKlBQZPvnjit62YKEo0KBjl7qk/x1y4bDK2yX06eatJ2uwIXWL/8ysH1CYThmbM/UCev2USGto4RRuvdeE8IyMW3 Cc: Patches, the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28][RFC] systemd Integration X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:16:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 00:43, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Sorry but it is not clear what you mean; do you prefer him to squash > all changes in a single patch or have an initial patch and queue > patches above this with the fixes? I prefer a logical series of correct patches, which will probably involve squashing into a single commit and then splitting the pieces out afterwards. (with a reference to what version of meta-oe the series was based on) Ross