From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2742783B7 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Jun 2017 07:24:05 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,343,1493708400"; d="scan'208";a="981223334" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Jun 2017 07:24:04 -0700 To: Peter Kjellerstedt , "Burton, Ross" References: <4b8a955e4779a8fc3a113947622d09f47e71b00e.1497534748.git.pkj@axis.com> <8b3d9920b9bb447bb6c7574a7ae42b6e@XBOX02.axis.com> <55a5ee84-9b57-8f96-5a0f-fd66b495e42b@linux.intel.com> From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: <3d43fd13-b3c2-48cd-b8bf-e16ff8f7c9a8@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 17:24:12 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] gtk+3: Update the patches to work without PATCHTOOL = "git" X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:24:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/15/2017 05:22 PM, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: >>> Well, I am pretty sure Git patches that rename files are not supposed >>> to be used, since quilt does not support this AFAIK. So the change in >>> this patch should be correct. >>> >>> However, I would be more than happy if anyone can explain why others >>> are not seeing this (or does everyone have PATCHTOOL = "git" in their >>> configurations somehow?) >> >> This is unlikely; I certainly don't. Perhaps if you provide the exact >> command that is being executed, and what is the error it prints, I >> could try to do the same? > > Well, I was running "bitbake core-image-sato", but "bitbake gtk+3" should > do... What I wanted to see is the failing command (quilt, or patch, or what is it specifically), and the error you get. gtk+3 is patched and built here with no issues at all. Alex