* Re: [AUH] u-boot-mkimage: upgrading to 2018.05 FAILED
2018-05-17 10:33 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2018-05-17 12:17 ` Burton, Ross
2018-05-17 13:04 ` Alexander Kanavin
2018-05-17 14:01 ` Tom Rini
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Burton, Ross @ 2018-05-17 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marek Vasut; +Cc: auh, OE-core
u-boot is excluded on the machine type that the AUH runs as, so
there's no way it can build the recipe.
Ross
On 17 May 2018 at 11:33, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/17/2018 11:53 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
>> On 05/17/2018 12:56 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>> Looks like AUH runs as a x86 machine, which is why it doesn't catch
>>> u-boot.
>>
>> Also we have already discussed this 2 month ago. Marek, as the u-boot
>> maintainer, can you look into enabling u-boot on qemu please?
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to fix the AUH so it handles U-Boot and
> similar packages correctly even without the qemu dependency ?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [AUH] u-boot-mkimage: upgrading to 2018.05 FAILED
2018-05-17 10:33 ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-17 12:17 ` Burton, Ross
@ 2018-05-17 13:04 ` Alexander Kanavin
2018-05-17 21:20 ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-17 14:01 ` Tom Rini
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kanavin @ 2018-05-17 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marek Vasut, Burton, Ross; +Cc: auh, OE-core
On 05/17/2018 01:33 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Looks like AUH runs as a x86 machine, which is why it doesn't catch
>>> u-boot.
>>
>> Also we have already discussed this 2 month ago. Marek, as the u-boot
>> maintainer, can you look into enabling u-boot on qemu please?
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to fix the AUH so it handles U-Boot and
> similar packages correctly even without the qemu dependency ?
Determining the latest upstream version, performing the recipe upgrade,
and testing that the upgraded version builds are all done by calling
bitbake. Which of course requires that MACHINE is set to something
specific, in this case qemux86. As u-boot is disabled there, it gets
skipped. I could special-case u-boot, but I do think it's better to
enable it on qemu, which would also allow better AB testing across
architectures and during runtime (booting images) for instance.
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [AUH] u-boot-mkimage: upgrading to 2018.05 FAILED
2018-05-17 13:04 ` Alexander Kanavin
@ 2018-05-17 21:20 ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-18 14:06 ` Alexander Kanavin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2018-05-17 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Kanavin, Burton, Ross; +Cc: auh, OE-core
On 05/17/2018 03:04 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On 05/17/2018 01:33 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> Looks like AUH runs as a x86 machine, which is why it doesn't catch
>>>> u-boot.
>>>
>>> Also we have already discussed this 2 month ago. Marek, as the u-boot
>>> maintainer, can you look into enabling u-boot on qemu please?
>>
>> Wouldn't it make more sense to fix the AUH so it handles U-Boot and
>> similar packages correctly even without the qemu dependency ?
>
> Determining the latest upstream version, performing the recipe upgrade,
> and testing that the upgraded version builds are all done by calling
> bitbake. Which of course requires that MACHINE is set to something
> specific, in this case qemux86. As u-boot is disabled there, it gets
> skipped. I could special-case u-boot, but I do think it's better to
> enable it on qemu, which would also allow better AB testing across
> architectures and during runtime (booting images) for instance.
Let's see how this works:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/915781/
Once this gets mainline, we should then be able to enable u-boot for
qemux86/qemux86-64 . I have a patch ready for that too, but let's wait
until the U-Boot patch discussion is over.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [AUH] u-boot-mkimage: upgrading to 2018.05 FAILED
2018-05-17 10:33 ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-17 12:17 ` Burton, Ross
2018-05-17 13:04 ` Alexander Kanavin
@ 2018-05-17 14:01 ` Tom Rini
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2018-05-17 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marek Vasut; +Cc: auh, OE-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 679 bytes --]
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:33:24PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 05/17/2018 11:53 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> > On 05/17/2018 12:56 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> >> Looks like AUH runs as a x86 machine, which is why it doesn't catch
> >> u-boot.
> >
> > Also we have already discussed this 2 month ago. Marek, as the u-boot
> > maintainer, can you look into enabling u-boot on qemu please?
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to fix the AUH so it handles U-Boot and
> similar packages correctly even without the qemu dependency ?
Note that in U-Boot we run (and run test.py on) qemu-x86 and qemux86-64
so there's no reason these days to mask U-Boot out.
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread