From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: mark.hatle@kernel.crashing.org,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, twoerner@gmail.com
Cc: mark.hatle@amd.com
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Rework WIC sector size
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:23:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40ebc4d041650d232f7ebd9c95d9fbe9d202437a.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1773361726-30192-1-git-send-email-mark.hatle@kernel.crashing.org>
On Thu, 2026-03-12 at 19:28 -0500, Mark Hatle via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> This work is effectively based on the 'v7' of the 'standalone wic'
> submission. It was requested that the submission be broken into
> individual parts so we can review and get merge things individually.
>
> Changes from v7:
>
> Introduction of additional (previous implementation) vfat 4k tests.
>
> Update the test suite to add a new cmdline argument test in addition
> to (not replacing) the previous variable version of the test.
>
> Update the test case to include fat partition tests.
>
> Cleanup Deprecation message so it only displays once, if the older
> style is used. In v7 the message may have been displayed twice.
>
> Mark Hatle (1):
> oeqa/selftest: wic: Add vfat to test_wic_sector_size
>
> Trevor Woerner (1):
> wic: re-implement sector-size support
Something in here failed in testing:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/23/builds/3519
wic.Wic2.test_mkfs_extraopts
ERROR: A sector/block size is specified in both the mkfs-extraopts argument (-S 1024) and the wic arguments (512) and they do not match.
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/35/builds/3401
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/48/builds/3292
Cheers,
Richard
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-13 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 0:28 [PATCH 0/2] Rework WIC sector size Mark Hatle
2026-03-13 0:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] oeqa/selftest: wic: Add vfat to test_wic_sector_size Mark Hatle
2026-03-13 0:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] wic: re-implement sector-size support Mark Hatle
2026-03-13 11:23 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40ebc4d041650d232f7ebd9c95d9fbe9d202437a.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mark.hatle@amd.com \
--cc=mark.hatle@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=twoerner@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox