From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3877C60102 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 21:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Oct 2017 14:18:44 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,482,1500966000"; d="scan'208";a="157257216" Received: from pnaidu-mobl.gar.corp.intel.com (HELO peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.255.147.41]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Oct 2017 14:18:42 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Mike Looijmans Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 10:18:38 +1300 Message-ID: <4488567.fOZDuWkyH7@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> Organization: Intel Corporation In-Reply-To: <8b6c437e-c5b6-d242-5e1c-b19406153c76@topic.nl> References: <8b6c437e-c5b6-d242-5e1c-b19406153c76@topic.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Recipe versions and layer confusion X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 21:18:44 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Mike, On Friday, 6 October 2017 3:49:28 AM NZDT Mike Looijmans wrote: > I'm confused. > > Layer "meta-xilinx" defines: > > recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_2017.1.bb > > This recipe is too old for my liking, so I made a newer one in "meta-topic" > > recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_2017.3.bb > > > Much to my surprise, when I build, OE picks the 2017.1 version and not the > 2017.3 version. > > bitbake-layers show-layers reveils: > .. > meta-xilinx /home/mike/projects/zynq-platform/meta-xilinx 5 > meta-topic /home/mike/projects/zynq-platform/meta-topic 6 > .. > > so that means that my meta-topic should win even if my PV were lower, right? At face value I would have to agree - it doesn't sound like it's working the way it should. What does bitbake-layers show-recipes arm-trusted-firmware show ? Another diagnostic would be to do bitbake -DDD arm-trusted-firmware and see if it gives any explanation as to why it's picking the older version (you'll have to wade through all of the other irrelevant debug info though). Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre