From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE01F5580E for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:51:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout-03.galae.net (smtpout-03.galae.net [185.246.85.4]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.msgproc01-g2.16493.1776682280777077969 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 03:51:22 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=fail reason="dkim: body hash did not verify" header.i=@bootlin.com header.s=dkim header.b=D0uP/Xru; spf=pass (domain: bootlin.com, ip: 185.246.85.4, mailfrom: joaomarcos.costa@bootlin.com) Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-03.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 889854E42A68 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44B035FFA5 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 693C910460CD0 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:51:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1776682277; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:references; bh=vgsII9fwf++KltgTmCW9poqm0Y/STkoG+bq5fJGTJFY=; b=D0uP/XruVXczwFvEGLEcx+Jxfho9fYtD7ABBZ4e44uyhbPIEdKUOUprXr4o0J01wq1C4t6 +QfqgfYtIy/kn5OwSf12h8lQEETPW+67xTrMXxyHs4awipTEvGqkqzSh4WfXVdgTSVOTN7 hDzdiOCWNzd+qNhDOfWYdjlJMpI/BPb1ajq77d8Zgz9SRWnW5YeSM+QdKXBiB3CR6qXfTa EEmOyQsi4Rv21i8ZALVGepYjEChaH7nC2oKX39S6Ao4viRgOzvtrN+TdRi9qwszYCxIsnq KEmNRyjJBAHld7Fheyp15yTJ9l3JstH9lNZjN0x0i95tTZe/J3Ka2llyhmM8PA== Message-ID: <44c2174a-52ea-4f1f-ab73-d7a0b02a79ef@bootlin.com> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:51:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [OE-core][scarthgap 00/11] Patch review To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: Content-Language: en-US, fr From: Joao Marcos Costa Organization: Bootlin In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:51:27 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/235562 Hello, On 4/20/26 11:21, Yoann Congal via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > On Mon Apr 20, 2026 at 10:44 AM CEST, Joao Marcos Costa wrote: >> Hello, Yoan >> >> >> On 3/30/26 00:46, Yoann Congal via lists.openembedded.org wrote: >>> Please review this set of changes for scarthgap and have comments bac= k by >>> end of day Tuesday, March 31. >> (...) >> >> Was the commit below not picked, or am I missing something? >> >> commit b24d5cda19136fb8120154279eedd55d162b4640 >> Author: Jo=C3=A3o Marcos Costa (Schneider Electric) >> >> Date: Fri Apr 3 11:32:30 2026 +0200 >> >> linux-yocto/6.6: update CVE exclusions (6.6.123) >> >> This new version of cve-exclusion_6.6.inc was generated with oe-= core's >> latest version of the generate-cve-exclusions.py. >> >> Regarding the database used and how this file was generated: >> >> Generated at 2026-04-03 09:30:32.247568+00:00 for kernel version >> 6.6.123 >> From cvelistV5 cve_2026-04-03_0700Z >> >> The backporting of the generate-cve-exclusions.py script from ma= ster to >> Scarthgap is handled in a different patch. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jo=C3=A3o Marcos Costa (Schneider Electric) >> >> >> However, I see the commit below, prior to this one, was kept: >> >> linux/generate-cve-exclusions: backport script from master branch >> >> I'm not really used to the backports schedule/workflow, so please excu= se >> me if I misinterpreted something. >> >> Thanks! >=20 > This patch triggered a problem in our infra. I received it directly fro= m > you but it is missing from lore. And lore feeds patchwork, and I use > patchwork to prepare my review branch... >=20 > This is a known problem: 16167 =E2=80=93 Missing (big) patch in patchwo= rk > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D16167 >=20 > I've reopened and added your patch to the bug log. >=20 > I will now integrate your patch in my review branch. >=20 > Thanks for the report, otherwise I would have missed it. >=20 > I'll try to check for this issue in the future but this will be hard to > spot. If you send a similar patch in the future don't hesitate to ping > me if you see it missing during the patch review period. >=20 > Regards, Ack. Thanks! --=20 Best regards, Jo=C3=A3o Marcos Costa