From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8633C60191 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-10) with ESMTPSA id w9PCiOGC010604 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:44:26 +0100 Message-ID: <463dbed17206ffb20d05962af4249d64443dbe98.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Changqing Li , Andre McCurdy Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:44:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4572e29a-3b92-745d-b794-20e514b961a8@windriver.com> References: <1540441116-366611-1-git-send-email-changqing.li@windriver.com> <4572e29a-3b92-745d-b794-20e514b961a8@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.1 at dan X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: OE Core mailing list Subject: Re: [PATCH] openssl: change make install run serially X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:44:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2018-10-25 at 13:10 +0800, Changqing Li wrote: > > On 10/25/2018 12:59 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 9:18 PM, > > wrote: > > > From: Changqing Li > > > > > > openssl offcially don't supprt parallel make install, and have > > > occasionally install fail problem for parallel build, > > > according to upstream suggestion, just make install serially. > > > > > > refer: > > > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/7466#issuecomment-432148137 > > > > Wouldn't setting PARALLEL_MAKEINST be cleaner than patching the > > Makefile? > > You are right, I will resend the patch. I've commented upstream and I think they're reconsidering this so I'm going to wait and see if they do take a patch to fix things which we could then backport. Cheers, Richard