From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TXei9-0001BB-HN for openembedded-core@lists.linuxtogo.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 22:04:57 +0100 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2012 12:49:23 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,758,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="217999135" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.192]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2012 12:49:58 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: Martin Jansa Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 20:49:56 +0000 Message-ID: <4701269.Boc8pSq2zM@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.9.2 (Linux/3.2.0-32-generic-pae; KDE/4.9.2; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20121111201613.GB3407@jama.jama.net> References: <12301427.Yf0uchSh3U@helios> <2026428.K88ggMmWnu@helios> <20121111201613.GB3407@jama.jama.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.linuxtogo.org, openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: OE-Classic recipe migration status X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:04:57 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Sunday 11 November 2012 21:16:13 Martin Jansa wrote: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 07:58:09PM +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Sunday 11 November 2012 20:52:26 Martin Jansa wrote: > > > I've noticed quite a few recipes listed here, which does exist in some > > > layer (recipes mostly from meta-fso, meta-aurora, meta-shr), should I > > > remove them from that wiki page or add layer name in 2nd column? > > > > I did have all the layers in meta-smartphone included in the list I used > > to > > filter this one, so if there are items that somehow didn't get removed I'd > > like to figure out why. Can you list them here so I can look into that? > > Ah sorry, you're probably right > > I've noticed e.g this: > libfsobasics [distro] > libfsoresource [distro] > libfsosystem [distro] > libfsotransport [distro] > but those are now provided by single libfsoframework recipe and I've > forgot this change > https://github.com/shr-distribution/meta-smartphone/commit/0298befc97dc5dca2 > a3721fb0ff9d4caf8d24f84 > > So I'll just update [distro] flag to something like obsoleted by > libfsoframework. Ah ok, sounds good. > The rest is probably also not 1:1 like qfsodbusxml2cpp-native > ./meta-fso/recipes-freesmartphone/freesmartphone/qfsodbusxml2cpp_git.bb > > Maybe you can try to update scripts to show matches after "-native" > suffix strip? I'd prefer to handle this manually - there are cases when newer recipes haven't been BBCLASSEXTENDed to handle -native so I've been checking this by hand. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre