diff for duplicates of <4791.1722292240522892465@lists.openembedded.org> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 566a4a0..86b5fde 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -No, it is not in my scope. I am not the responsible or mainntainer for it, and i do not understand the latest patch what it like to do and what should it resolved. I can not solve it, sorry. It was reported a half year ago. +No, it is not in my scope. I am not the responsible or mainntainer for it, and i do not understand the latest patch what it like to do and what should it resolved. I can not solve it, sorry. It was reported a half year ago, it should be resolved by a real maintainer/developer. -Please if it is not working as before, do not commit it, rather revert this patch which cause a totally buggy license deploying at the moment in the latest Scarthgap LTS. LTS branch shall not contains this kind of quality, in normally. +Please, if it is not working as before, do not commit it. Rather revert this patch which cause a totally buggy license deploying at the moment in the latest Scarthgap LTS. LTS branch shall not contains this kind of quality, in normally. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index af791a4..4e4785d 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ "ref\0CANNYZj-DiZRQVPK=_96_8=qw5TQYoHZTVTfi9X7GKUfPno1Dtw@mail.gmail.com\0" "From\0Livius <egyszeregy@freemail.hu>\0" "Subject\0Re: [scarthgap][master] license archiving is failed to tmp/deploy/licenses\0" - "Date\0Mon, 29 Jul 2024 15:30:40 -0700\0" + "Date\0Mon, 29 Jul 2024 15:35:14 -0700\0" "To\0openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "No, it is not in my scope. I am not the responsible or mainntainer for it, and i do not understand the latest patch what it like to do and what should it resolved. I can not solve it, sorry. It was reported a half year ago.\n" + "No, it is not in my scope. I am not the responsible or mainntainer for it, and i do not understand the latest patch what it like to do and what should it resolved. I can not solve it, sorry. It was reported a half year ago, it should be resolved by a real maintainer/developer.\n" "\n" - Please if it is not working as before, do not commit it, rather revert this patch which cause a totally buggy license deploying at the moment in the latest Scarthgap LTS. LTS branch shall not contains this kind of quality, in normally. + Please, if it is not working as before, do not commit it. Rather revert this patch which cause a totally buggy license deploying at the moment in the latest Scarthgap LTS. LTS branch shall not contains this kind of quality, in normally. -c8dbd3cc1ae68f7d127301688eb134a20b7a5b58f31579b8696cb79a7489fc93 +6a7075f6bffdb8bd65c39d479ceb0e213e8ff51fbdabe083de8b6c62d0731639
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox