From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org,
Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/78] Review & ACK
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:34:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4930472.WmY8LRsmSd@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LZddy=dtdm_wdqg+GJQmxmt24uhmNe8J6hM6gnK_ikocw@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday 26 July 2013 10:35:20 Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 26 July 2013 08:14, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Emilia Ciobanu (12):
> > babeltrace: fix recipe name
> > build-appliance-image: fix recipe name add GIT revision to PV variable
> > chkconfig-alternatives-native: fix recipe name and add GIT revision to
> >
> > PV variable
> >
> > connman-gnome: fix recipe name add GIT revision to PV variable
> > docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native: fix recipe name
> > docbook-sgml-dtd-4.1-native: fix recipe name
> > hwlatdetect: fix recipe name and add GIT revision to PV variable
> > lttng-ust: fix recipe name and add GIT revision to PV variable
> > mtd-utils: fix recipe name and add GIT revision to PV variable
> > neard: fix recipe name
> > rt-tests: fix recipe name add GIT revision to PV variable
> > update-rc.d: fix recipe name and add GIT revision to PV variable
>
> I meant to chime in on this yesterday but was... tied up. For
> packages where the SRC_URI is a git repo *but* we're only ever
> checking out release tags do we really need to rename the package to
> _git? The _git version to me implies "a mostly working snapshot of
> the development release" not "a stable release".
It's also going to be hard to be consistent in renaming everywhere as well
because I think in a few cases we already have a bleeding-edge _git recipe in
addition to the release recipe being built from git.
I guess I've not been very coherent on this, sorry for the confusion Emilia. I
think we need to take a step back and make sure we're doing the right thing
here, especially if we're only doing it to accommodate the current behaviour
of distrodata.bbclass.
> > bluez5: disable obex by default
>
> The message seems to allude to some other reason for disabling it
> apart from a systemd user service not being packaged. Is there a
> reason, as the systemd issue should be fixable in systemd.bbclass.
>
> Apart from that, Acked-By: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>.
I've also looked over the rest of the patches, they're OK by me as well.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-26 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 7:14 [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/78] Review & ACK Saul Wold
2013-07-26 9:35 ` Burton, Ross
2013-07-26 15:34 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2013-07-29 6:10 ` Koen Kooi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4930472.WmY8LRsmSd@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=sgw@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox