From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PzZvv-0002nU-6n for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:29:32 +0100 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2011 12:27:48 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,190,1299484800"; d="scan'208";a="720479673" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.146]) ([10.255.12.146]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2011 12:27:48 -0700 Message-ID: <4D7FBDAB.7040501@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:27:39 -0700 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Purdie References: <161e1f47c2460d5b2463300e31bf5eebb46b8698.1300172958.git.dvhart@linux.intel.com> <4D7F9CC2.2030002@linux.intel.com> <1300213438.30423.1820.camel@rex> In-Reply-To: <1300213438.30423.1820.camel@rex> Cc: Koen Kooi , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] kernel: rework kernel and module classes to allow for building out-of-tree modules X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:29:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/15/2011 11:23 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 10:24 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Darren Hart wrote: >>> >>> What are the ownership and perms on those? >>> >>> I suppose we could avoid the .pc directory - but it's going to require >>> something more than cp or some additional scripting. Something like tar's >>> exclude functionality might be needed - but I hate to add the intermediate >>> step as the kernel recipes are already so slow. >> >> >> hmmm I wonder why those are marked non readable in .pc directory that >> seems wrong to me > > Its quilt that does this. Kind of annoying but its been doing that for a > few versions now... I recall purging .pc for this reason (just in other development, outside of poky). I take it deleting .pc from the build dir would be bad as it would make build/hack/build fail to work on the workdir tree. That leaves changing the permissions and copying it, or just avoiding the copy. I'm leaning towards avoiding the copy - but I hate to add a ton of scripting logic in the copy, but that may be the best solution. > > Cheers, > > Richard > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel