From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PzaSG-0005rI-NH for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:02:56 +0100 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2011 13:01:13 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,190,1299484800"; d="scan'208";a="403083398" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.146]) ([10.255.12.146]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2011 13:01:13 -0700 Message-ID: <4D7FC580.7060307@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:01:04 -0700 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Purdie References: <161e1f47c2460d5b2463300e31bf5eebb46b8698.1300172958.git.dvhart@linux.intel.com> <4D7F9CC2.2030002@linux.intel.com> <1300213438.30423.1820.camel@rex> <4D7FBDAB.7040501@linux.intel.com> <1300217648.30423.1837.camel@rex> In-Reply-To: <1300217648.30423.1837.camel@rex> Cc: Koen Kooi , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] kernel: rework kernel and module classes to allow for building out-of-tree modules X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:02:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/15/2011 12:34 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 12:27 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >> >> On 03/15/2011 11:23 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 10:24 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Darren Hart wrote: >>>>> >>>>> What are the ownership and perms on those? >>>>> >>>>> I suppose we could avoid the .pc directory - but it's going to require >>>>> something more than cp or some additional scripting. Something like tar's >>>>> exclude functionality might be needed - but I hate to add the intermediate >>>>> step as the kernel recipes are already so slow. >>>> >>>> >>>> hmmm I wonder why those are marked non readable in .pc directory that >>>> seems wrong to me >>> >>> Its quilt that does this. Kind of annoying but its been doing that for a >>> few versions now... >> >> I recall purging .pc for this reason (just in other development, outside >> of poky). >> >> I take it deleting .pc from the build dir would be bad as it would make >> build/hack/build fail to work on the workdir tree. That leaves changing >> the permissions and copying it, or just avoiding the copy. I'm leaning >> towards avoiding the copy - but I hate to add a ton of scripting logic >> in the copy, but that may be the best solution. > > Can't you just do a "cp -r xxx/*" and if you need any . files "cp > xxx/.*" ? Well yes, I suppose I can. Duh. Sorry, forest for the trees and all that. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel