Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] bitbake.conf: Prune global OPTIMIZATION flags
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:11:13 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D930FD1.7060402@mlbassoc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin-x-h3wi=F=g4kcFfA6CSLgh3mZ0Z5Dw6HgXVy@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/29/2011 07:31 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Gary Thomas<gary@mlbassoc.com>  wrote:
>> On 03/29/2011 09:00 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>
>>> On (29/03/11 14:34), Richard Purdie wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 11:11 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> -fexpensive-optimizations is enabled by default at -O2
>>>>>
>>>>> -fomit-frame-pointer is enabled at -O2 selectively by gcc depending upon
>>>>>    architecture if debug info is not hurt
>>>>>
>>>>> -frename-registers - This might have some performance advantage on top
>>>>>   of O2 on architectures which have more registers and registers are left
>>>>>   after scheduling but it affects debuggability quite a bit so as a i
>>>>>   tradeoff we do not use it.
>>>>>
>>>>> -feliminate-dwarf2-dups - We use this option to reduce the size of debug
>>>>>   information by removing duplicates this is only valid for dwarf2+ and
>>>>> we
>>>>>   use dwarf2 by default
>>>>
>>>> I've disabled this flag for now as it was causing too many failures
>>>> across the board (various apps, prelinker). We can add it back when this
>>>> has been tested more extensively and its been confirmed to work with the
>>>> prelinker.
>>>
>>> It would have been better to disable one by one we would be able to
>>> utilize current testing. Most probaly the prelink issue is due to
>>> -feliminate-dwarf2-dups did you try to remove that out ?
>>
>> This change, in particular adding -feliminate-dwarf2-dups, breaks my
>> build of chromium(*) (in strange ways, it ends up building .a libraries
>> which the linker can't parse).  Everything else I've tried to build
>> seems OK though.  For now, I've just dropped this option in my DISTRO.conf
>
> You dont have to after Richard already dropped it from bitbake.conf
> its better to stay close enough to defaults

Absolutely.  Thanks, Richard, for moving quickly on this.

>>
>> (*) It took quite some time to isolate this as the problem as it is a royal
>> pain to test BTW as it takes more than an hour to build this one package on
>> my
>> hefty build server!
>
> hmmm I wonder if its disabling PARALLE_MAKE ?

Nah, it's just *HUGE* - the tmp/work build tree is ~8GB

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------



  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-30 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-21 18:10 [PATCH 0/3] Prune global compilation flags Khem Raj
2011-03-21 18:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] bitbake.conf: Prune global OPTIMIZATION flags Khem Raj
2011-03-29 13:34   ` Richard Purdie
2011-03-29 15:00     ` Khem Raj
2011-03-29 23:53       ` Gary Thomas
2011-03-30  1:31         ` Khem Raj
2011-03-30 11:11           ` Gary Thomas [this message]
2011-03-30  1:29       ` Khem Raj
2011-03-21 18:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] machine/include/tune-atom.inc: Remove FULL_OPTIMIZATION_pn-gtk+ Khem Raj
2011-03-21 18:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb: Fix ICE in gcc-runtime with -feliminate-dwarf2-dups Khem Raj
2011-03-23 17:10 ` [PATCH 0/3] Prune global compilation flags Richard Purdie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D930FD1.7060402@mlbassoc.com \
    --to=gary@mlbassoc.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox