From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QCyAk-0006YS-2b for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 20:00:10 +0200 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Apr 2011 10:57:44 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,252,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="682068377" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.58]) ([10.255.13.58]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Apr 2011 10:57:44 -0700 Message-ID: <4DB07017.80503@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:57:43 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <8313867A-EA5C-473D-A82B-D8338186BF5F@dominion.thruhere.net> <201104211605.28351.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> <1303404025.9960.6.camel@vorpal> <6252772B-4D5D-4E5D-BCD5-1A53C1D25AFA@dominion.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: <6252772B-4D5D-4E5D-BCD5-1A53C1D25AFA@dominion.thruhere.net> Cc: Koen Kooi Subject: Re: [RFC] Working toward a GNOME layer X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:00:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/21/2011 10:29 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 21 apr 2011, om 18:40 heeft Joshua Lock het volgende geschreven: > >> On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 16:05 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>> On Thursday 21 April 2011 15:02:49 Koen Kooi wrote: >>>> and possibly more. I would like to create a meta-gnome layer in the >>>> meta-openembedded repository where new recipes get added and things from >>>> meta-demoapps can get moved over into. Long term recipes-gnome in oe-core >>>> should move there as well. >>>> >>>> What are your thoughts on this? >> >> +1 >> >>> >>> From my perspective this sounds like a great idea. The only question would be >>> how much of the "GNOME" libs would remain in oe-core as some of them are quite >>> widely used outside of GNOME proper; however that can easily be worked out as >>> these things mature. >> >> +1 >> >> My personal opinion would be that we start with glib& gtk+ (plus their >> dependencies, i.e. pango, atk, etc) in core and move the rest out to a >> layer. >> >> I feel that Gtk+ is used by enough non-gnome software that it belongs in >> core but others may disagree? >> I agree with Joshua here, I think that we need to keep some amount of core gnome libraries in oe-core. >> Between meta/recipes-gnome and meta-demoapps we have a reasonable start >> to a meta-gnome/ > > Where did meta-demoapps go? It's not in OE-core anymore by the looks of it. > Still there for me. >> I'd be happy to help with this layer. > > Awesome, do you have any objection to put meta-gnome into the meta-openembedded repo for the time being? Once we get better tooling we can move it elsewhere, of course. > Why not on git.yoctoproject.org? We already have the start of various meta-* layers there? Sau! > regards, > > Koen > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core