From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QJTe5-0003G8-BO for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 18:49:21 +0200 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2011 09:46:36 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,341,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="744555161" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.75]) ([10.255.12.75]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2011 09:46:35 -0700 Message-ID: <4DC81A6B.3040708@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 09:46:35 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: fuse update X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 16:49:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/03/2011 07:06 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello, > > I am migrating some stuff to oe-core and found it has fuse at > meta-demoapps. It seems no recipes depends on fuse in oe-core and thus > I am wondering how is better to deal with its updating as: > > - should it be done in oe-core? > - should it be moved to meta-oe? > > The requirement for me to update it is due it being required by a new > recipe I am adding to meta-oe and then it seems more logical to me to > move fuse to meta-oe but I am curious to hear from others about it. > It would make sense for you to move it to meta-oe at this time, if we find more recipes require it our other layers are needed it, then we can consider it for oe-core. Sau! > Cheers, >