From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QKhpt-0003Xy-9h for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 04:10:37 +0200 Received: from dlep36.itg.ti.com ([157.170.170.91]) by arroyo.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id p4D23LU2007142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 May 2011 21:03:21 -0500 Received: from dlep26.itg.ti.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dlep36.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4D23KM1015511; Thu, 12 May 2011 21:03:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dlee74.ent.ti.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dlep26.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4D23KD5017651; Thu, 12 May 2011 21:03:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by dlee74.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.106.1; Thu, 12 May 2011 21:03:20 -0500 Received: from gtwmills.gt.design.ti.com (gtwmills.gt.design.ti.com [158.218.100.52]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4D23K2x026235; Thu, 12 May 2011 21:03:20 -0500 Message-ID: <4DCC9168.1090100@ti.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 22:03:20 -0400 From: William Mills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darren Hart References: <4DCC3BA6.3010406@windriver.com> <4DCC4A51.9010309@linux.intel.com> <4DCC4D17.7000600@linux.intel.com> <4DCC59B7.1070309@ti.com> <4DCC721D.8000705@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4DCC721D.8000705@linux.intel.com> Cc: poky , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [poky] Commit and Patch message guidelines - fifth draft X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 02:10:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/12/2011 07:49 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > There is: http://www.yoctoproject.org/community/mailing-lists > > Which needs to be updated to better reflect the oe-core aspect I think. This might be at least one source of the cross posting as people are not sure poky vs oe-core. >> It seems to me there is a whole bunch of discussion happening on the >> poky list about making changes that that would effect everyone using >> openembedded-core. Do we have two lists for discussion of stuff that >> effect the oe-core? > > No. As I understand it, things that go into poky.git/meta and things > that go into oe-core should be sent to the openembedded-core list. Patch > series for poky.git should be isolated in such a way so that they do not > include changes to meta (oe-core) and other areas at the same time. > > Does anyone have a different view? > This seems logical to me. Thanks. I also think discussion of a potential patch should be done on the list that the patch would go to yes? Maybe we could drive that definition to ground and get the mailing list page updated. --- So above, perhaps my "whole bunch" was overstated. Let me retract that and say at least some. I don't mean to pick on you Darren; I really am just trying to understand and an example is often helpful. Earlier you and Richard were discussing directdisc images [1] with a suggestion that it might be ripe for removal. Should that have been on oe-core? [1] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky/2011-May/006106.htm Thanks, Bill