From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QKiqD-0004cZ-Fg for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 05:15:01 +0200 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2011 20:12:11 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,362,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="1107209" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.78]) ([10.255.12.78]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2011 20:12:11 -0700 Message-ID: <4DCCA18B.4040505@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:12:11 -0700 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: William Mills References: <4DCC3BA6.3010406@windriver.com> <4DCC4A51.9010309@linux.intel.com> <4DCC4D17.7000600@linux.intel.com> <4DCC59B7.1070309@ti.com> <4DCC721D.8000705@linux.intel.com> <4DCC9168.1090100@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <4DCC9168.1090100@ti.com> Cc: poky , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [poky] Commit and Patch message guidelines - fifth draft X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 03:15:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/12/2011 07:03 PM, William Mills wrote: > > On 05/12/2011 07:49 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >> There is: http://www.yoctoproject.org/community/mailing-lists >> >> Which needs to be updated to better reflect the oe-core aspect I think. > > This might be at least one source of the cross posting as people are not > sure poky vs oe-core. > >>> It seems to me there is a whole bunch of discussion happening on the >>> poky list about making changes that that would effect everyone using >>> openembedded-core. Do we have two lists for discussion of stuff that >>> effect the oe-core? >> >> No. As I understand it, things that go into poky.git/meta and things >> that go into oe-core should be sent to the openembedded-core list. Patch >> series for poky.git should be isolated in such a way so that they do not >> include changes to meta (oe-core) and other areas at the same time. > > > > Does anyone have a different view? > > > > This seems logical to me. Thanks. I also think discussion of a > potential patch should be done on the list that the patch would go to yes? > > Maybe we could drive that definition to ground and get the mailing list > page updated. > > --- > > So above, perhaps my "whole bunch" was overstated. Let me retract that > and say at least some. > > I don't mean to pick on you Darren; Oh, I think I asked for this one :-) > I really am just trying to > understand and an example is often helpful. Earlier you and Richard > were discussing directdisc images [1] with a suggestion that it might be > ripe for removal. Should that have been on oe-core? > You are correct. I should have sent that to oe-core as the implementation in question is in poky.git/meta (ie oe-core). Clearly, this is easy to miss and will take some time for us to get there. Thanks for pointing that out! > [1] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky/2011-May/006106.htm > > Thanks, > Bill -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel