From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QPJ3G-0001P8-3F for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:43:26 +0200 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 May 2011 11:40:22 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,268,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="7530343" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.181]) ([10.255.12.181]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 May 2011 11:40:22 -0700 Message-ID: <4DDD4D1B.5050301@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 11:40:27 -0700 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <4DDBDE9D.5000709@linux.intel.com> <1306338695.27470.41.camel@rex> <20110525164919.GB11519@mail.familie-heinold.de> In-Reply-To: <20110525164919.GB11519@mail.familie-heinold.de> Cc: Koen Kooi Subject: Re: Updating u-boot for oe-core or meta-yocto X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 18:43:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/25/2011 09:49 AM, Henning Heinold wrote: > Hi, > > I agree with khem, each machine should maintain it's bootloader in his bsp > or layer. I'm leaning this way as well. I think oe-core should remain at an official u-boot tagged release, like 2011.03 and layers can then extend that with a proper .bbappend file. Then we can share the u-boot core recipe and just add backported patches in the layers as needed. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel