From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QPb1k-0002mx-EO for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 15:55:04 +0200 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 May 2011 06:51:59 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.181]) ([10.255.12.181]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 May 2011 06:51:59 -0700 Message-ID: <4DDE5B0F.5080901@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 06:52:15 -0700 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <6EC98D6A-BEF1-468A-A69B-7CBF4EAB28BA@beagleboard.org> In-Reply-To: <6EC98D6A-BEF1-468A-A69B-7CBF4EAB28BA@beagleboard.org> Cc: Koen Kooi Subject: Re: [pull-oe-uboot 2/2] u-boot: rename u-boot_git.bb to u-boot_${PV}.bb X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 13:55:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/26/2011 12:58 AM, Jason Kridner wrote: > On May 26, 2011, at 12:02 AM, Darren Hart > wrote: > >> In order to facilitate reuse of the oe-core u-boot recipe, there >> needs to be some assurance that the oe-core version won't change >> without a clear indicator to people extending it. >> >> By renaming the recipe to include its version string instead of >> "git", BSP layers can extend a specific base version of u-boot, >> ie. u-boot_2011.03.bbappend. When 2011.06 becomes available, we can >> create that file without instantly breaking all the BSPs depending >> on oe-core version of the recipe. >> >> As a matter of policy I would recommend we not carry more than 2 >> versioned u-boot recipess at any given time. This will provide BSP >> layers time to migrate to the newer version, without cluttering >> oe-core with numerous stale versions of u-boot. We may decide later >> to resurrect u-boot_git.bb as an AUTOREV recipe to faciliate >> upstream development on u-boot in the oe environment. > > This sounds especially useful for automated testing of upstream. I'd > be interested in setting up a public daily build and test report in > such a configuration. Let me know if it would be redundant. That is the sort of thing this caters to, yes. And no, I don't think your testing in this way would be redundant - at least not with respect to anything I'm doing. -- Darren > >> >> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart Cc: Richard >> Purdie Cc: Koen Kooi >> Cc: Jason Kridner >> --- .../uboot/{u-boot_git.bb => >> u-boot_2011.03.bb} | 0 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 >> deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-bsp/uboot/{u-boot_git.bb => >> u-boot_2011.03.bb} (100%) >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/uboot/u-boot_git.bb >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/uboot/u-boot_2011.03.bb similarity index 100% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/uboot/u-boot_git.bb rename to >> meta/recipes-bsp/uboot/u-boot_2011.03.bb -- 1.7.1 >> > > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core > mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- > Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel