From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QRpcJ-0004h5-E1 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:54:04 +0200 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2011 10:50:52 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,304,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="10459856" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.41]) ([10.255.13.41]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2011 10:50:51 -0700 Message-ID: <4DE67BFB.2020705@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:50:51 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <4DE5CDA3.1020000@linux.intel.com> <4DE5D4AC.4090805@gmail.com> <20110601061050.GA3281@jama.jama.net> <4DE5DA86.7040808@gmail.com> <1306925194.2529.38.camel@phil-desktop> In-Reply-To: <1306925194.2529.38.camel@phil-desktop> Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcmode-default: disable ARMv7 Optimization for qt4-x11-free X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:54:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/01/2011 03:46 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 23:21 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> On 05/31/2011 11:10 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:57:00PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> On 05/31/2011 10:26 PM, Saul Wold wrote: >>>>> | ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/arch/qatomic_arm.h:361:35: >>>>> error: output number 1 not directly addressable >>>> >>>> this is a coding error you can fix the source code I guess instead of >>>> pessimising the whole package >>> >>> FWIW: I haven't seen it in my armv7-a builds (nokia900), but I'm using >>> gcc-4.6 from meta-oe. >> >> this is because gcc 4.6 in meta-oe has fix for it its this patch here >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01477.html > > I'm a bit confused by this. In the first quote above you said that this > was a coding error and ought to be fixed in qt, but now you seem to be > saying that it's a compiler bug and should be fixed in gcc. If it's the > latter, can we get that patch applied to the oe-core version of gcc? > > Either way, I agree, working around this by just frobbing the > architecture options seems like a bad idea. > > p. > Khem, Is there any chance that you would be willing to throw me a patch that address this issue based on the gcc patch? If not. let me know and I will try to muddle my way through it ;-)! Sau! > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >