From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QRspy-00013f-Cx for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:20:26 +0200 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p51LHAgV020276 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:17:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Macintosh-5.local (172.25.36.226) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:17:10 -0700 Message-ID: <4DE6AC56.7010308@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:17:10 -0500 From: Mark Hatle Organization: Wind River Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Phil Blundell References: <1306944074.2529.107.camel@phil-desktop> <1306944235.2529.109.camel@phil-desktop> <5DBF32A5-22D5-4499-AD32-9C48680B7EBA@dominion.thruhere.net> <1306945014.2529.113.camel@phil-desktop> <4DE66D53.30505@windriver.com> <1306947245.2529.148.camel@phil-desktop> <4DE66FC6.4030607@windriver.com> <1306948134.2529.158.camel@phil-desktop> <4DE68B24.8060503@windriver.com> <1306958566.3119.1.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> In-Reply-To: <1306958566.3119.1.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: rpmdeps, was Re: dbus-native --with-x X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:20:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/1/11 3:02 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 13:55 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: >> The issue is that it uses the librpm, librpmdb, librpmio, and librpmmisc >> libraries. These libraries provide and use all of the rest of the components. > > Right, but would rpmdeps still be able to do what it needs to if rpm was > built --without-openssl etc? The output from ldd isn't especially > enlightening in itself because all that tells us is which libraries > librpm was built against. > > p. > > I'm not sure if the libraries that RPM uses would even be able to link w/o openssl. (I never tried it.) But that will affect people who are using RPM packages as signing and validation routines come from openssl. --Mark