From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: Tell me your build error message annoyances!
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:22:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DE8EE32.9060905@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DE87AD1.1050004@linux.intel.com>
On 6/3/11 1:10 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>
>
> On 05/31/2011 03:26 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
...
> o In general I find the default UI to be exceedingly noisy. It feels
> very much like what I would write for something I was actively
> developing - ie, something I expect to break a lot! I don't think
> that's the sort of impression we want users to have while building a
> release (for example).
I have heard similar comments from others as well.
> I'd prefer if what we currently get today was the output of -D. The
> current output could instead be something a lot more in the vein of
> what we see with recipe parsing. Perhaps one line per
> BB_NUMBER_TREADS (N), maybe something like:
>
> Task 2300/4600 [#################### ]
> 0: linux-yocto: do_compile
> 1: matchbox: do_fetch
> ...
> N: dbus: do_configure
>
> It would of course update the current lines and not scroll. Most of
> the time, this would be plenty information. Upon failure we stop
> updating the "UI" and print something like:
Even if it did scroll, somehow limiting the messages being printed would be
beneficial. It's been suggested to me simply one (or two) messages per step MAX.
Running linux-yocto do_compile
Running matchbox do_fetch
...
I believe currently we have around 3-5 messages per step, and it's still too
noisy -- unless you need to debug something.
> ERROR: An unhandled exception occured while processing
> linux-yocto: do_fetch
>
> Exception: No such file or directory.
>
> Run with -D for a more detailed error report or consult the
> appropriate log file:
>
> $(pwd)/tmp/work/$machine/linux-yocto-$HASH-$HASH \
> /temp/log.do_fetch.$PID
>
> Or something along those lines.
>
> Thanks for collecting these Scott, great idea!
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-03 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-31 22:26 Tell me your build error message annoyances! Scott Garman
2011-06-01 1:34 ` mark gross
2011-06-01 15:06 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-01 16:25 ` Richard Purdie
2011-06-01 16:58 ` Chris Larson
2011-06-03 14:35 ` mark gross
2011-06-03 14:48 ` Paul Eggleton
2011-06-02 14:17 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-02 7:34 ` Martin Jansa
2011-06-03 6:10 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-03 8:11 ` Richard Purdie
2011-06-03 14:22 ` Mark Hatle [this message]
2011-06-03 15:43 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-03 15:47 ` Chris Larson
2011-06-07 4:53 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-07 9:18 ` Richard Purdie
2011-06-06 21:13 ` Scott Garman
2011-06-03 14:57 ` Koen Kooi
2011-06-09 11:02 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-09 11:17 ` Richard Purdie
2011-06-09 15:00 ` Scott Garman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DE8EE32.9060905@windriver.com \
--to=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox