From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QWFvO-00036q-Ec for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:48:02 +0200 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1QWFs5-0002dZ-Gp from Tom_Rini@mentor.com for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:44:37 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.96.206]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:40:02 -0700 Received: from [172.30.80.132] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-02.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.96.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:44:36 -0700 Message-ID: <4DF692CA.3030000@mentor.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:44:26 -0700 From: Tom Rini Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <46ED2218-6735-449C-B10C-D557B92DA339@dominion.thruhere.net> <4DF672F2.2030909@linux.intel.com> <49501374-7FBE-400E-A91B-BD7EBD7FB65C@dominion.thruhere.net> <1308000620.15712.288.camel@rex> <4DF68AD4.1020403@mentor.com> <1308004543.15712.297.camel@rex> In-Reply-To: <1308004543.15712.297.camel@rex> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jun 2011 22:40:02.0610 (UTC) FILETIME=[D57C2120:01CC2A1A] Subject: Re: Where is atom-pc.conf hiding? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:48:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/13/2011 03:35 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 15:10 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: >> On 06/13/2011 02:30 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 22:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>> Op 13 jun 2011, om 22:28 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: >>>> >>>>> On 06/13/2011 11:31 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Khem was asking if I could reproduce the recent x86 breakage he was seeing[1] and I ran into another bug: >>>>>> >>>>>> koen@dominion:/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel$ git blame meta-n450/conf/machine/n450.conf | grep atom >>>>>> 158f88d7 (Saul Wold 2011-01-03 15:33:52 -0800 6) require conf/machine/atom-pc.conf >>>>>> >>>>> meta-yocto seems to be the place you need to look! >>>>> >>>>> I hope that the layering tools can help to detect and inform folks of this like of dependency. >>>> >>>> Isn't meta-yocto supposed to a the integration layer with no new >>>> parts? I can't use meta-yocto since it has conflicting beagleboard >>>> stuff in it, which means that meta-intel is now broken for me as well. >>>> That surely isn't the intended plan?!?! >>> >>> The plan on public record is that atom-pc moves to meta-intel as soon as >>> the layer tooling comes online and meta-yocto becomes its own repo >>> (which at present its not but its certainly the intent). >> >> Until then, and even afterwards can we please get some testing of >> non-poky builds done? I know the autobuilder is full but can't we toss >> a few things onto a personal box and try that a few times a week? > > Sure, the more people testing the various combinations the better! I fear I'm not being clear. Can You, Saul and maybe other folks making frequent submissions and are at times more poky-oriented than not, do this as well? While I'd love the world I'd settle for a bunch of -g's to catch obvious problems and a console-image or something.. -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation