From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pz0-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QXCsx-0005Dn-9h for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:45:28 +0200 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so1206066pzk.6 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 06:41:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ejRsSDpAWOQLRvfiWl/2csrvVujdN66QNz2EXNM9STA=; b=UT7Fuxw/rn7WO3ftwmltcItFL5o2OoxbP0LLf/O/LeJRH3eVcyWBRLkx1byiB0nN4u M8QjXmVu5Sgv6SgoAasREK950afGOenFp/57L+go836y9iUmxSePhg3/GpJRwJW3IpCy etdB+U4GN3kJv9hLhE2C240duz2NhPUj2B9kg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CRdN82Ui04/zsQp0HZ94wgr/xdarCx56AZfVBtIo7pFmaEqZ7rU/ZVpMEUyIVlcGjY BLTkUZfb9aKflsWx2GlDSOJ69oRA7ns7+fKJkMsrnJ9u0/5PXKpMWNzbtA3iZQnmC33e JbFLtVf4gwnvPqbwv4tAJxD0GuAzPMwAqYiOI= Received: by 10.142.127.8 with SMTP id z8mr145233wfc.225.1308231718561; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 06:41:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.82] (99-57-141-118.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.57.141.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z39sm934736wfd.23.2011.06.16.06.41.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 06:41:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DFA0824.5030809@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 06:41:56 -0700 From: Khem Raj User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1308219330.25285.4194.camel@phil-desktop> In-Reply-To: <1308219330.25285.4194.camel@phil-desktop> Subject: Re: eglibc testing? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:45:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/16/2011 3:15 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > I just ran "make check" under qemu on my eglibc-2.13 build (from oe-core > master) and got rather a lot of failures. It wasn't immediately obvious > to me whether these were libc bugs, qemu infelicities, oe-related > harness problems, or some kind of local finger trouble. > > Before I spend too much time investigating this, are other people seeing > the same effect? What approach do the Yocto folks use for glibc > testing: are they running the testsuite directly on target hardware, or > via qemu, or something else? I nfsmount eglibc builddir on target and run the testsuite. I see aroung 10-15 fails. Havent run the testsuite in a while > > The gcc testsuite is next on my list to look at and, again, I'd be > interested to hear what approach other folks are using there and what > sort of results they are currently getting. > I have a script that I use to launch cross testing needs a bit of setup like passwordless ssh access to target. Results are pretty sane I have posted results to oe-ml occasionally. I can start some testsuite once my build finishes today and post. > thanks > > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core