From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pz0-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QXLsy-0003hi-Ob for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:22:04 +0200 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so1521173pzk.6 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:18:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WDpklFn6T5JvtbFS5/SgYtc0+5jI7oZqzqI4o/lYNHw=; b=pMuJm4MLX5Ngo3GY/JIkukc8+dBy5/kqfsLcT8YmfrY/wr350gDNi5iBAtaYYumcTX PsVDwiypwCEn3PCIzduvdk+81+jW8999/1W1SNzfiYqpkDztCAUy8piCbyXk6OSUz98l dcWObCuc0oE9YvLi/+Hyw8unwfljRQ6GfnEg4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YMiPjLtC0f3AJBE+L0s3LEpg7vseua99zBB7j7FjVaT09B1GJ1LBcxhCbh6gm2zkMG t118fXPdwwfG8l/O9KxuIgciX01OHtFXGbtj6NiugqFJkwVYEyMZdh01lVwTMOABpJvp HP6iAGomn+x1QJ9wpvtwQ2AlOLy0GK90tLKw4= Received: by 10.142.154.12 with SMTP id b12mr286846wfe.156.1308266315923; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:18:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.70] (99-57-141-118.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.57.141.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c10sm1794052wff.0.2011.06.16.16.18.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:18:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DFA8F49.8000309@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:18:33 -0700 From: Khem Raj User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1308219330.25285.4194.camel@phil-desktop> <4DFA0824.5030809@gmail.com> <1308234598.25285.4740.camel@phil-desktop> In-Reply-To: <1308234598.25285.4740.camel@phil-desktop> Subject: Re: eglibc testing? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:22:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/16/2011 07:29 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 06:41 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> I nfsmount eglibc builddir on target and run the testsuite. I see aroung >> 10-15 fails. Havent run the testsuite in a while > > Maybe the right thing to do with eglibc would be to build a rootfs > containing the testsuite, run it up in qemu-system-arm, and then > engineer some IPC mechanism to get the test results back to the host. using nfs isnt bad either since the tests excercise libraries from /lib on target IOW installed eglibc. > That way you would at least be testing something close to the real > target kernel, rather than the qemu syscall emulation which I suspect is > to blame for some of my failures. > > For gcc it'd probably be fine to just run the individual tests under > qemu directly since they don't tend to have a lot of OS dependency. > Yes I think I should put together my mechanism somewhere and post it and dejaGNU setup I use for cross testing > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core