From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QXdYb-0000i5-H9 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:14:15 +0200 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2011 11:10:43 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,382,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="16322581" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.7]) ([10.255.13.7]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2011 11:10:43 -0700 Message-ID: <4DFB98A2.9040303@intel.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:10:42 -0700 From: Scott Garman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <3a0dd72238fb6dbdbfc9ff1f0230f310fde0fff9.1308249837.git.scott.a.garman@intel.com> <4DFA97A1.9090909@gmail.com> <4DFB820B.9070303@intel.com> <4DFB8CAE.8030100@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] base-passwd: disable problematic login.defs options X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:14:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/17/2011 10:22 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 17:19, Scott Garman wrote: >> Sorry, I forgot to mention that shadow-utils-native is what is used to >> modify the passwd/group files in the target sysroot. It seems that having a >> -native recipe install files into a target sysroot would be worse than >> including an optional file with base-passwd that may or may not be used in >> target systems. > > Why not make an shadow-target package with this? To just install a login.defs file? I'm open to it if a few more people think this is a better idea. Scott -- Scott Garman Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project Intel Open Source Technology Center