From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QZNGO-0008W3-QJ for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:14:37 +0200 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2011 06:11:01 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,406,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="18269797" Received: from kyu3-desk.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.238.154.176]) ([10.238.154.176]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2011 06:11:00 -0700 Message-ID: <4E01E9E3.9090202@intel.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:10:59 +0800 From: Yu Ke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <33AB447FBD802F4E932063B962385B3554AE4989@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> <201106171842.49291.paul.eggleton@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: Chris Larson , paul.eggleton@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC - combo layer repo tool X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:14:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit on 2011-6-19 6:47, Chris Larson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: >> Hi Ke, >> >> Great work. Here's my review so far: >> >> On Monday 13 June 2011 14:15:04 Yu, Ke wrote: >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/scripts/combo-layer-hook-default.sh >>> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ >>> +#!/bin/sh > > First thought on starting to read the patch: why are we home rolling a > parser when the format is clearly ini style, which the ConfigParser > module parses just fine? Paul, Chris, Thanks a lot for your valuable comment. I've sent out the V2 RFC patch, and has all your comments included. Please review. Regards Ke