From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QbZBF-0007fw-Se for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:22:22 +0200 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jun 2011 07:18:39 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,437,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="19746995" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.106]) ([10.255.13.106]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jun 2011 07:18:38 -0700 Message-ID: <4E09E2BE.3090203@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:18:38 -0700 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ilya Yanok References: <1308182971-23082-1-git-send-email-yanok@emcraft.com> <4E0953FB.508@linux.intel.com> <4E09A570.9070206@emcraft.com> In-Reply-To: <4E09A570.9070206@emcraft.com> Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] u-boot-mkimage: bump version to 2011.03 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:22:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Ilya, On 06/28/2011 02:57 AM, Ilya Yanok wrote: > Hi Darren, > > 28.06.2011 8:09, Darren Hart wrote: >> These look like good changes to me, with a couple of minor things needed: >> >> 1) Please submit the version change independently from the added >> patches to keep things functionally distinct. > > Hm.. Actually the new version won't build without the patches, so I > think this should be addressed by a single commit. Maybe I should add a > note on this in the commit message though... Ah, that is unfortunate :/ > >> 2) The patch from you marked as Submitted: has this received any >> discussion on the u-boot list? > > Yes, it's already applied (with some cosmetic changes). I will repost my > oe-core with the new versions of U-Boot patches. Please let me know if > you still think these should be two separate commits. Please update the upstream status on the new patch and resubmit as a single patch. Thanks! -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel