From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbin7-00066I-1y for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:38:05 +0200 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jun 2011 17:34:22 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,440,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="21279652" Received: from miles.jf.intel.com (HELO [10.7.199.155]) ([10.7.199.155]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jun 2011 17:34:22 -0700 Message-ID: <4E0A730B.2050401@intel.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:34:19 -0700 From: Scott Garman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Conflicting providers for ssh/sshd (dropbear and openssh) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:38:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/28/2011 03:41 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > If they are independent then may be the openssh recipe should be > divided into openssh-ssh and openssh-rest so one can use openssh > provided daemon or dropbear provided as they wish I'm happy to do this, but won't be able to get to it until early next week. In the meantime Yocto bug #1009 is tracking this issue. Scott -- Scott Garman Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project Intel Open Source Technology Center