From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qebkn-000153-9a for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 01:43:37 +0200 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Jul 2011 16:39:45 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,489,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="23537389" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.240]) ([10.255.13.240]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Jul 2011 16:39:40 -0700 Message-ID: <4E14F23C.5050001@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:39:40 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <1309881139.2410.14.camel@phil-desktop> <201107051731.12273.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> <1309891044.3176.7.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <201107061506.04010.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <201107061506.04010.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Cc: Paul Eggleton Subject: Re: [PATCH] bluez-dtl1-workaround: remove PRIORITY X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:43:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/06/2011 07:06 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Tuesday 05 July 2011 19:37:24 you wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 17:31 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>> Is it possible some people are still using PCMCIA/CF cards with this >>> hardware in it? >> >> It's certainly possible, yes. But I don't think that the mere >> possibility is a very strong argument for keeping the recipe in oe-core. >> Maybe it would be better suited to meta-oe or some BSP layer, > > You're right, I guess it doesn't really belong in oe-core. > Phil, I will take a patch that deletes from here and adds it into the meta-extra's layer. Sau! > Cheers, > Paul >