From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QfDiE-00030o-UW for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:15:31 +0200 Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Jul 2011 09:09:36 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,500,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="27911063" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.187]) ([10.255.13.187]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Jul 2011 09:09:33 -0700 Message-ID: <4E172BBD.30709@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 09:09:33 -0700 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <1b743a32b4fc3ccdea5ebbb94691d6441bdd706a.1309503004.git.sgw@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: Koen Kooi Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] uboot: Update to 2011.06 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:15:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/01/2011 12:16 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 1 jul 2011, om 08:54 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: > >> [YOCTO #1198] >> >> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold >> --- >> ...Drop-config.h-include-in-tools-imximage.h.patch | 0 >> ...ove-LDSCRIPT-processing-to-the-top-level-.patch | 0 >> ...kimage_2011.03.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2011.06.bb} | 12 +++++------- >> .../uboot/{u-boot_2011.03.bb => u-boot_2011.06.bb} | 10 +++++----- > > You do realize that people .bbappending 2011.03 are now left out in the cold, right? My apologies to Saul as I probably contributed to this by not being explicit in the bug report. As stated in my earlier mail regarding uboot policy, we should keep at least two revisions of u-boot around to give people time to migrate to the newer one (if they can at all). -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel