From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qghj5-0000k4-7T for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:30:31 +0200 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2011 11:26:33 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,522,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="25018419" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.40]) ([10.255.14.40]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2011 11:26:32 -0700 Message-ID: <4E1C91D8.4050403@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:26:32 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <1122cff5b635c23b36bc76ad58a088f522ac21a5.1310425837.git.sgw@linux.intel.com> <1310461868.6337.179.camel@phil-desktop> <1310462034.6337.181.camel@phil-desktop> In-Reply-To: <1310462034.6337.181.camel@phil-desktop> Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/26] shared_lib.bbclass: create common class X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 18:30:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/12/2011 02:13 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 10:11 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: >> On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 16:13 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: >>> This class is for packages that do not work with debian library naming >> >> I tend to feel that most of those packages should be fixed so that they >> do. If they aren't currently getting renamed then it usually means that >> they include too much (i.e. both binaries and libraries, or multiple >> libraries) and should be split up so that this doesn't happen. > > Actually, looking at the patch more carefully I guess this does > basically address the first case above (binaries and libraries). But it > looks like it will result in the slightly confusing situation where the > libraries go into lib${PN} but the corresponding headers are in > ${PN}-dev. > Correct, this is trying to address the existing cases that have both binaries and libraries, I guess the other way to do this would be for those 5 or so packages to use "lib_packaging" and which renames the binary packages ${PN}-bin and the libraries then get auto renamed via debian renaming rules. This is kind of the inverse of lib_packaging.bbclass, binaries go in ${PN} and libraries need to be placed into the named lib${PN}. As for headers and debug, they go in the ${PN}-[dev,dbg] packagse I can go with Koen's name of shlibpackaging.bbclass Sau! > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >