From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx2.ll.mit.edu ([129.55.12.46]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QlqWK-0001BV-Lo for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:54:36 +0200 Received: from LLE2K7-HUB02.mitll.ad.local (LLE2K7-HUB02.mitll.ad.local) by mx2.ll.mit.edu (unknown) with ESMTP id p6QMoLhq025427; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:50:21 -0400 Message-ID: <4E2F44AC.4040803@ll.mit.edu> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:50:20 -0400 From: Jeff Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110721 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darren Hart References: <4E2F384F.6060907@ll.mit.edu> <4E2F429E.5030607@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4E2F429E.5030607@linux.intel.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813, 1.0.211, 0.0.0000 definitions=2011-07-26_07:2011-07-27, 2011-07-26, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1107260218 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] bb-matrix.sh: check for the existence of time X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:54:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/26/2011 06:41 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > > Hi Jeff, > > Thanks for the patch. A couple points of feedback below: > > On 07/26/2011 02:57 PM, Jeff Mitchell wrote: >> What an existential subject. The patch is quite self-explanatory. > > Well, there is almost always a need for commit log beyond just the > subject. The only exception might be "whitespace fixes only" or > "spelling fixes only". I did write a commit log, but git-format-patch turned it into the subject of the attached patch. No, I haven't used git-format-patch before :-) (I've been fortunate to have been able to avoid it for many years now.) > Also, while it is tempting to squeeze in typo fixes and such with a > functional patch, unless they are in the code you are changing anyway, > they should be sent as separate patches. Given the triviality of both changes I didn't think this would be an issue. --Jeff