From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QnyBa-0003pm-4o for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:29:58 +0200 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Qny7O-0005aS-Ib from Tom_Rini@mentor.com for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:25:38 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-05.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.43]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:25:38 -0700 Received: from [172.30.80.87] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-05.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:25:37 -0700 Message-ID: <4E36FDA2.7030001@mentor.com> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:25:22 -0700 From: Tom Rini Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <1312206333.2344.456.camel@rex> In-Reply-To: <1312206333.2344.456.camel@rex> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Aug 2011 19:25:38.0418 (UTC) FILETIME=[CB536D20:01CC5080] Subject: Re: Commits to master in my absence X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:29:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/01/2011 06:45 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > I'm a little frustrated to see what happened when I was away from a > couple of days. I thought we'd agreed we'd queue up patches in a branch > and then I'd take care of things when I got back. So, I agree with everything you did say. But I'd also like to suggest we should have gone with "merge everything Monday" not "merge everything Wednesday before RP runs off". Yes, this would have meant either moving some testing, or having testing also pull from a different (merged) branch. And I too was "wait, what, more stuff went in? I thought we caught the big problem already". - -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJONv2eAAoJEI4NMjfc3nJxudcIAMg7yMIdl648ZdRsFGAUTKTD HSP8lLzawtEcl1bxektShH7amCf45wHvlw36joNNt3dG78FwAfO9bozubZEypwcS N7YXBo8JVJVi1WUIni23CZor4I091Ubt0tEHFOk4iDIyU9B9q+T77xg2qn+r6RJN 7yNzs7XRffM8D2v7OxG/6kK4FvQDflVbnqEYkN+dE0rgUFOMUDdaSkB5JO0NShG2 yYLkXljRNJ24Of5crsuQ/F4Vqk86b41Ax9jYrdFUOl+qgdovbPs3ninKtbDgT9ez Adh8behhx/LvbQQNldOi0l/UakPAmEPHEjEBNxmKX/GoZjfLHN0nb4Ucy5sAtBM= =PIo2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----