From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eglibc: unify eglibc-utils/${PN}-utils and remove PACKAGES from eglibc.inc
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 10:27:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E38336B.8010604@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110729073415.GM15286@jama.jama.net>
On 07/29/2011 12:34 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:17:31AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> * PACKAGES were defined in eglibc.inc as well as eglibc-package.inc, definition
>> from eglibc.inc was overriden from recipes including eglibc.inc only
>> * 37ff0fea8f7180b1a9d91d24dfe1735730427497 changed RPROVIDES_eglibc-utils,
>> but ie FILES_ were still using eglibc-utils instead of ${PN}-utils, unify
>> all eglibc-utils
>
> BTW: there is still problem with ie
> RPROVIDES_${PN}-utils = "glibc-utils"
> leading to
> ERROR: Trying to resolve runtime dependency glibc-utils resulted in conflicting PREFERRED_PROVIDER entries being found.
> The providers found were: ['virtual:nativesdk:/OE/shr-core/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.13.bb', '/OE/shr-core/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.13.bb']
> The PREFERRED_PROVIDER entries resulting in this conflict were: ['PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libc-nativesdk = eglibc-nativesdk', 'PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libc = eglibc']
> NOTE: multiple providers are available for runtime glibc-utils (eglibc, eglibc-nativesdk, external-csl-toolchain, external-poky-toolchain)
> NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match glibc-utils
>
> now with glibc recipes removed, do we need to RPROVIDE this or can we fix recipes
> RDEPENDing on glibc-utils to use eglibc-utils directly?
>
> otherwise we should fix right side to use ${PN/eglibc/glibc} to keep
> eglibc-nativesdk from providing glibc-utils (glibc-nativesdk-utils only).
>
Martin,
Richard pushed a fix to this and possibly addressed most of your changes
in the above patch also, please rebase you patch against the
oe-core/master and resend if you have any additional fixes to make in
this area.
Thanks
Sau!
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-02 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-29 7:17 [PATCH] eglibc: unify eglibc-utils/${PN}-utils and remove PACKAGES from eglibc.inc Martin Jansa
2011-07-29 7:34 ` Martin Jansa
2011-08-02 17:27 ` Saul Wold [this message]
2011-08-08 7:56 ` [PATCH 10/10] eglibc: " Martin Jansa
2011-08-08 13:00 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E38336B.8010604@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox