From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yi0-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QozrA-0004kG-KR for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:29:09 +0200 Received: by yib18 with SMTP id 18so1175956yib.6 for ; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:24:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uhtaXPPTXzCEKUmEepOez8StkIhPTHhgeCM5eN8ff8Q=; b=QBr477oBrhiu9BTq0gkpyIOGyHSr3zQRyXaSs6JR9qh4llXr/ubntDBhVV4a96dFbh ctmWcd15LT1F9Yn51iAb5uJYbj0U1YgzvErJ0dQg9cUH3dlUehjzPLxdmOopWv9kdo/2 Ut/TmzpO6HDauXeYl3MhEikGJFfk/bepi/frw= Received: by 10.142.188.7 with SMTP id l7mr835093wff.385.1312471484121; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:24:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.70] (99-57-141-118.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.57.141.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v2sm2331434pbi.35.2011.08.04.08.24.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E3AB9B9.9010201@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:24:41 -0700 From: Khem Raj User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110627 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: 64-bit gcc hack patch / X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:29:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/04/2011 12:55 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > What is meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/64bithack.patch really accomplishing at this point? > > Its not clear to me what benefit or what is really impacted by the following change: > > MULTILIB_OPTIONS = m64/m32 > -MULTILIB_DIRNAMES = 64 32 > -MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES = ../lib64 $(if $(wildcard $(shell echo $(SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR))/../../usr/lib32),../lib32,../lib) > +MULTILIB_DIRNAMES = . 32 > +MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES = . $(if $(wildcard $(shell echo $(SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR))/../../usr/lib32),../lib32,../lib) > > Trying to decide if the ppc equivalent of this patch is really needed or not. I think this patch should not be needed. > > - k > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core