From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QpJwk-00053u-Q4 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:56:15 +0200 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p75CpkM6020565 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 5 Aug 2011 05:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.147.214] (128.224.147.214) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 05:51:46 -0700 Message-ID: <4E3BE761.6070407@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 08:51:45 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 ThunderBrowse/3.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kumar Gala References: <5EF017EC-CCFD-4040-9455-D022611ACD0E@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <5EF017EC-CCFD-4040-9455-D022611ACD0E@freescale.com> Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org list" , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: Use of git.pokylinux.org vs git.yoctoproject.org in kernel recipe. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 12:56:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11-08-05 08:50 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > In the linux-yocto_3.0.bb recipe we have: > > meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb:SRC_URI = "git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-3.0;protocol=git;nocheckout=1;branch=${KBRANCH},meta;name=machine,meta" > > Should this really be git.yoctoproject.org? Yep, it should be! I'm sending a pull request for queue of kernel changes, so I'll toss this on top of the pile. Bruce > > [ I think the sites might be interchangeable, but seems like being consistent is good. With the name of the recipe being yocto, and with the 2.6.34. and 2.6.37 kernel recipes ] > > --- > > There is a more general question if yoctoproject.org should be preferred over pokylinux.org > > - k