From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QpN41-0004kk-Oe for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:15:58 +0200 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Aug 2011 09:11:32 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,323,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="36235876" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.76]) ([10.255.14.76]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Aug 2011 09:11:31 -0700 Message-ID: <4E3C1633.9000505@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 09:11:31 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Ashfield References: <5EF017EC-CCFD-4040-9455-D022611ACD0E@freescale.com> <4E3BE761.6070407@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <4E3BE761.6070407@windriver.com> Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org list" , Kumar Gala , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [yocto] Use of git.pokylinux.org vs git.yoctoproject.org in kernel recipe. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 16:15:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/05/2011 05:51 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 11-08-05 08:50 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: >> In the linux-yocto_3.0.bb recipe we have: >> >> meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb:SRC_URI = >> "git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-3.0;protocol=git;nocheckout=1;branch=${KBRANCH},meta;name=machine,meta" >> >> >> Should this really be git.yoctoproject.org? > > Yep, it should be! I'm sending a pull request for queue of kernel > changes, so I'll toss this on top of the pile. > Already done Sau! > Bruce > >> >> [ I think the sites might be interchangeable, but seems like being >> consistent is good. With the name of the recipe being yocto, and with >> the 2.6.34. and 2.6.37 kernel recipes ] >> >> --- >> From - Fri Aug 05 08:18:45 2011 > X-Mozilla-Status: 0010 > X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 > Return-Path: > X-Original-To: sgw@linux.intel.com > Delivered-To: sgw@linux.intel.com > Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com (azsmga001.ch.intel.com [10.2.17.19]) > by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B0A6A4087; > Fri, 5 Aug 2011 08:18:39 -0700 (PDT) > Received: from azsmga102.ch.intel.com ([10.2.16.52]) > by azsmga001-1.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Aug 2011 08:18:40 -0700 > X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true > X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: > AkwAAH8JPE6M06l6mWdsb2JhbABAA5gYj0sUAQEBAQEICwsHFCWBQAEBAQEDAQEBNwwDBwUKDAMLAwMBAgMDAQEBAQgRBAEBAQoUCAEHAwEjAQoUCQgCBAESBQOHab8ag0CCJ18EkHSHHhWLQQ > > X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,323,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="749637259" > Received: from yocto-www.yoctoproject.org ([140.211.169.122]) > by mtab.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Aug 2011 08:18:28 -0700 > Received: from yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CAEE011C0; > Fri, 5 Aug 2011 08:18:14 -0700 (PDT) > X-Original-To: yocto@yoctoproject.org > Delivered-To: yocto@yoctoproject.org > Received: from mx01no.tycohealthcare.com (mx01no.tycohealthcare.com > [216.75.208.72]) > by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C119FE011BF > for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 08:18:09 -0700 (PDT) > X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,323,1309752000"; d="scan'208";a="285840293" > Received: from unknown (HELO tamans-bh02.thcg.net) ([10.80.3.108]) > by mx01no.tycohealthcare.com with ESMTP; 05 Aug 2011 11:18:17 -0400 > Received: from TAMANS-HT100V.thcg.net ([10.80.9.28]) by > tamans-bh02.thcg.net > with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:18:17 -0400 > Received: from TAMANS-HT101V.thcg.net (10.80.9.29) by > TAMANS-HT100V.thcg.net > (10.80.9.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.1; > Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:18:17 -0400 > Received: from TAMANS-MB100V.thcg.net ([169.254.8.245]) by > TAMANS-HT101V.thcg.net ([10.80.9.29]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.001; > Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:18:17 -0400 > From: "Ourada, Paul" > To: Richard Purdie , Todd Cooper > > Thread-Topic: [yocto] prebuilt pacakages > Thread-Index: AQHMU0eqaudMXigntU+XF//SkgCRv5UOXQSg > Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:18:15 +0000 > Message-ID: <4D9E0AFD9C2FCC428A8EAADA898F5B2D018515@TAMANS-MB100V.thcg.net> > References: <1312468953.58082.YahooMailNeo@web161219.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> > <1312469993.14274.10.camel@rex> > <1312480201.81774.YahooMailNeo@web161219.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> > <1312497831.14274.53.camel@rex> > <1312508226.49460.YahooMailNeo@web161217.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> > <1312532006.14274.62.camel@rex> > In-Reply-To: <1312532006.14274.62.camel@rex> > Accept-Language: en-US > Content-Language: en-US > X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.80.12.32] > MIME-Version: 1.0 > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Aug 2011 15:18:17.0436 (UTC) > FILETIME=[E71049C0:01CC5382] > Cc: "\"yocto@yoctoproject.org\"" > Subject: Re: [yocto] prebuilt pacakages > X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org > X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 > Precedence: list > List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto > List-Unsubscribe: , > > List-Archive: > List-Post: > List-Help: > List-Subscribe: , > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Sender: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org > Errors-To: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org > > I'm no expert, but would the use of something like Puppet make this job > a lot easier? A consultant is suggesting that we consider that tool for > this purpose. Define a particular set of packages in Puppet, and you can > play around in your sandbox to your heart's content. When you want to > get back to a particular configuration, let Puppet do that for you. It > may be a little heavyweight for some projects, but I'd think that any > project which needs stricter control could use this. > > http://www.puppetlabs.com > > Paul E. Ourada > Sr. Principal Software Engineer > Covidien, Energy-based Devices > 5920 Longbow Drive > Boulder, CO 80301 > paul.ourada@covidien.com > www.covidien.com > Main: 303-530-2300 > Ofc: 303-581-6940 > Fax: 303-581-6741 > > -----Original Message----- > From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org > [mailto:yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Richard Purdie > Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 2:13 AM > To: Todd Cooper > Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" > Subject: Re: [yocto] prebuilt pacakages > > On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 18:37 -0700, Todd Cooper wrote: >> Can I suggest that Yocto put it on the futures list, but with a lower >> priority? > > You can add it to the list on the wiki. > > Which known set of prebuilt packages are you thinking we should be able > to build against? > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >