Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: gcc version mismatch in sdk generation
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 19:33:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E409C78.2060908@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <840A81C1B782724A8EB52725BD519EFF1832E3@MBX20.4emm.local>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2215 bytes --]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/08/2011 06:52 PM, James Limbouris wrote:
> On Tuesday, 9 August 2011 9:40 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 6:33 PM, James Limbouris 
>> <james@digitalmatter.com.au> wrote:
>>> On Tue Aug 9 01:25:55 CEST 2011, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 05:02 +0000, James Limbouris wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> In oe-core, with Angstrom 2010.x, generating an sdk with:
>>>>> 
>>>>> bitbake meta-toolchain-qte
>>>>> 
>>>>> is giving me a toolchain with gcc-4.6.1 binaries in the i686 
>>>>> sysroot, but gcc-4.5.4 runtime libraries in the arm (target)
>>>>> sysroot. The sdk can't link until a symlink is installed to
>>>>> trick it into using the 4.5.4 libraries.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've checked the preferred versions, but they seem to be set 
>>>>> consistently in the disto's conf file, at least as far as I
>>>>> can see.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 'bitbake -s | grep gcc' gives: gcc
>>>>> :4.5-r39.1+svnr176640 gcc-cross
>>>>> :4.5-r39.2+svnr176640 gcc-cross-canadian-arm
>>>>> :4.5-r39.0+svnr176640 gcc-cross-initial
>>>>> :4.5-r39.0+svnr176640 gcc-cross-intermediate
>>>>> :4.5-r39.0+svnr176640 gcc-crosssdk
>>>>> :4.5-r39.0+svnr176640 gcc-crosssdk-initial
>>>>> :4.5-r39.0+svnr176640 gcc-crosssdk-intermediate
>>>>> :4.5-r39.0+svnr176640 gcc-runtime
>>>>> :4.5-r39.1+svnr176640 gcc-runtime-nativesdk
>>>>> :4.6.1+svnr175454-r5 :4.5-r39.1+svnr176640 gccmakedep 
>>>>> 1:1.0.2-r3 libgcc :4.5-r39.1+svnr176640 libgcc-nativesdk 
>>>>> :4.6.1+svnr175454-r3     :4.5-r39.1+svnr176640
>>>> 
>>>> The nativesdk and crosssdk versions need to match at the very
>>>> least.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> Richard
>>> 
>>> Yes - that's what is so confusing. They seem to match in the
>>> Angstrom conf:
>> 
>> 
>> what does SDKGCCVERSION contain ?
>> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Here are edited highlights from bitbake -e | grep -i GCC:
> 

Can you try attached patch ? this is for meta-angstrom

Thx

- -Khem


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk5AnHcACgkQuwUzVZGdMxSX3gCgiMm/l2eOjT992lsqKaxnfuno
QVUAniNpa6BtGGrOjwjxfGFSdYCoHMWm
=EeKC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-angstrom-2010.x.conf-Pin-PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc-cross.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1229 bytes --]

From 8d6f9db776f30a2a88972fdb08856e0799839a25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 19:18:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] angstrom-2010.x.conf: Pin
 PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc-cross-canadian-${TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH}

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
---
 conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf b/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf
index e47561a..6622a1f 100644
--- a/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf
+++ b/conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf
@@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils                       ?= "${ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION
 PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils-cross                 ?= "${ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION}"
 PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils-crosssdk              ?= "${ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION}"
 PREFERRED_VERSION_binutils-cross-canadian        ?= "${ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION}"
+PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc-cross-canadian-${TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH} ?= "${ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION}"
 
 PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc                            ?= "${ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION}"
 PREFERRED_VERSION_gcc-cross                      ?= "${ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION}"
-- 
1.7.5.4


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-09  2:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-09  1:33 gcc version mismatch in sdk generation James Limbouris
2011-08-09  1:39 ` Khem Raj
2011-08-09  1:52   ` James Limbouris
2011-08-09  2:33     ` Khem Raj [this message]
2011-08-09  3:18       ` James Limbouris
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-08  5:02 James Limbouris
2011-08-08 23:25 ` Richard Purdie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E409C78.2060908@gmail.com \
    --to=raj.khem@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox