From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from hermes.mlbassoc.com ([64.234.241.98] helo=mail.chez-thomas.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QtiMb-0006FV-Ks for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:49:05 +0200 Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 999) id 941441660370; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:44:27 -0600 (MDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CBF1660367; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:44:26 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4E4BE1DA.1030109@mlbassoc.com> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:44:26 -0600 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Purdie References: <1312912632.14274.312.camel@rex> <27DA7A3C-0FE9-43CA-963C-F6217A1D2C9F@kernel.crashing.org> <1312981676.14274.376.camel@rex> <1312982631.14274.379.camel@rex> <4E4288F0.2010904@mlbassoc.com> <1312983621.14274.383.camel@rex> <4E428C20.5030809@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: <4E428C20.5030809@mlbassoc.com> Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: populate_sdk: We need to ensure that the SDK sysroot reflects PACKAGE_ARCH X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:49:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2011-08-10 07:48, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2011-08-10 07:40, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 07:34 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: >>> On a related thought to these changes - how does this play if >>> you use multiple SDKs for different, but somewhat related, architectures? >>> I'd like to create a simple SDK (just toolchain mostly) using 'meta-toolchain' >>> for both armv5te and armv7a and install them simultaneously on the same >>> host. My previous attempts at this fell flat as there were a number of >>> files marked as "arm" (i.e. not armv5te or arvm7a) that were common between >>> the two SDK packages, but they didn't seem to be identical. >> >> This is supposed to work but wouldn't due to the issue and the patch >> I've proposed. Whether that is the only issue I don't know. > > I'll be glad to test this once you've worked it out. > Any progress on this yet? The discussion seems to have died down... -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------