From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.89] helo=fmsmga101.fm.intel.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R9gYK-00078n-49 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:07:15 +0200 Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com ([209.85.161.52]) by mga01.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 30 Sep 2011 10:01:34 -0700 Received: by fxe23 with SMTP id 23so3020936fxe.25 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.37.68 with SMTP id w4mr3884020fad.49.1317402090344; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:01:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.6.18.230] (c-71-193-189-117.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [71.193.189.117]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k26sm7444265fab.12.2011.09.30.10.01.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E85F5E6.8050106@intel.com> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:01:26 -0700 From: Saul Wold Organization: Intel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110906 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <1317270070-14250-1-git-send-email-msm@freescale.com> <1317311276.12332.97.camel@ted> <1317321528.12332.110.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: <1317321528.12332.110.camel@ted> Cc: McClintock Matthew-B29882 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] libnl2: Fix a race on route/pktloc_syntax.h X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:07:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/29/2011 11:38 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 18:28 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Richard Purdie >> wrote: >>> On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 23:20 -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote: >>>> From: Tom Rini >>>> >>>> At issue is that route/pktloc.c (not generated) depends on >>>> route/pktloc_syntax.h (generated). >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini >>>> --- >>>> .../libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> meta/recipes-support/libnl/libnl_2.0.bb | 3 +- >>>> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>>> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch >>>> >>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch b/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 0000000..d396f96 >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ >>>> +--- >>> >>> Missing patch header... >> >> How would I mark this when this is an old version of libnl and it >> appears not to be a problem the latest version of libnl? > > I don't have the patch status field entries handy but you can certainly > document that the issue isn't present in version X so its likely been > fixed upstream already. I guess "Inappropriate" would cover that if > nothing else does. > Just for reference: http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines This contains the Upstream-Status: entries. Thanks Sau! > Cheers, > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >