From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gravedo.de ([85.214.79.159]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RE4Zq-0002JP-Vh for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:34:55 +0200 Received: by gravedo.de (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 3DEB2799089; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:29:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on h1108419.serverkompetenz.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from [192.168.178.21] (dslb-088-071-249-031.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.71.249.31]) by gravedo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71CF5799087 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:29:10 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E95EA85.5040301@gravedo.de> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:29:09 +0200 From: Simon Busch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <49a800f40bd08aa23d227dccafd34b3e59a7ccb5.1318405370.git.Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> <4E954984.7020202@eukrea.com> <4E95D811.7090105@gravedo.de> <1E1E70C9-6B15-497F-8571-78D2EF0CD081@dominion.thruhere.net> <4E95DDD0.7020302@gravedo.de> <4E95E97B.10707@gravedo.de> In-Reply-To: <4E95E97B.10707@gravedo.de> Subject: Re: [oe-core 1/4] qt4-embedded: remove dependency on tslib and use std. linux input X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:34:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12.10.2011 21:24, Simon Busch wrote: > On 12.10.2011 21:09, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> What is breaking qt:e in this case? For me it's just a feature reduction >>> and not a break (as qt:e still works fine with the linux input interface). >> >> When your TS is suddenly uncalibrated and jittery, it's a breakage, not a feature reduction. > > You're talking here about one case where tslib is needed to get a > working touchscreen. But there are even cases where tslib is not needed > to get a working touchscreen. > > qt:e does not strongly depends on tslib, it can work without. So if you > need it you should add it to your machine layer as it is really machine > specific if you need tslib or not. Eric brings it to the point, only resetting the qte.sh script to a default one which uses a linux input even node should be enough. -- Simon Busch - http://mm.gravedo.de/blog/