From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RL3pl-0000G8-M6 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 03:12:14 +0100 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pA1265Rg022654 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.225] (128.224.162.225) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.255.0; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:06:05 -0700 Message-ID: <4EAF545D.9000006@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 10:07:25 +0800 From: Kang Kai User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Saul Wold References: <4EAE0428.2020209@windriver.com> <4EAE04FF.1070207@windriver.com> <4EAED036.5070808@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4EAED036.5070808@intel.com> X-Originating-IP: [128.224.162.225] X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail.windriver.com id pA1265Rg022654 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: What is the strategy to update eglibc? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 02:12:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2011=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8801=E6=97=A5 00:43, Saul Wold wrote: > On 10/30/2011 07:16 PM, Kang Kai wrote: >> On 2011=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8831=E6=97=A5 10:12, Kang Kai wrote: >>> Hi Saul, >>> >>> I just want to update eglibc but eglibc is using its 2.14 branch and >>> use svn commit revision "15225" as current version. Of course it is >>> behind the latest svn revision, but I don't quit sure about which is >>> the right revision to update eglibc. >> Hi Saul, >> >> And right now is 2 commits behind the latest revision, do it worth to >> update right now? > > Kai, > > I know that Khem recently added the eglibc 2.14 recipe, but I think=20 > that we are still actually using the 2.13 recipe as defined by=20 > EGLIBCVERSION. > > At this point, it might be good to know what's changed by those 2=20 > commits and maybe do a full build and system test with EGLIBCVERSION=20 > set to 2.14 to find out if the problems are resolved. You might look=20 > back in the email list to mid-June to see what the original set of=20 > issues was. Thanks, Saul! I'll try that. > > Sau! > > >> Thanks! >> >>> >>> Could you give me some guide? Thank you! >>> >>> Regards, >>> Kai >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openembedded-core mailing list >>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >