From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.89] helo=fmsmga101.fm.intel.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RNBuV-00050E-8O for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 00:13:55 +0100 Received: from mail-yw0-f52.google.com ([209.85.213.52]) by mga01.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 06 Nov 2011 15:07:40 -0800 Received: by ywm13 with SMTP id 13so8557405ywm.25 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:07:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.217.195 with SMTP id pa3mr37475433igc.12.1320620859682; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:07:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (c-98-246-160-155.hsd1.or.comcast.net. [98.246.160.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm31044173pbj.18.2011.11.06.15.07.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:07:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EB71341.3020602@intel.com> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:07:45 -0800 From: Scott Garman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <505c8c4924bc7fcbea892c32b7144ee3b1b4c81b.1320607825.git.scott.a.garman@intel.com> <1320611116.3041.2.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> In-Reply-To: <1320611116.3041.2.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] useradd.bbclass: fix how RDEPENDS is setup X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:13:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/06/2011 12:25 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 11:31 -0800, Scott Garman wrote: >> Fix bug where only packages named PN included base-passwd in >> RDEPENDS. Also remove shadow requirement, since some targets >> do not use shadow and file ownership can be changed with only >> passwd/group entries. >> >> This fixes [YOCTO #1727] > > Don't you need shadow or some equivalent to provide /sbin/useradd so > that the postinsts work for on-target installs? Removing shadow from > RDEPENDS does sound like a good plan for the no-package-management case, > but I'm not sure it's safe otherwise. Of course you're right. Thank you for pointing this out. I will spin a v2 of the patchset. Scott -- Scott Garman Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project Intel Open Source Technology Center