From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.21] helo=orsmga101.jf.intel.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RNxan-0005an-HW for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 03:08:45 +0100 Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com ([209.85.210.44]) by mga02.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 08 Nov 2011 18:02:15 -0800 Received: by pzk32 with SMTP id 32so567537pzk.3 for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:02:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.23.130 with SMTP id m2mr1110752pbf.120.1320804134975; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:02:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (c-98-246-160-155.hsd1.or.comcast.net. [98.246.160.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c3sm8822614pbt.12.2011.11.08.18.02.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:02:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EB9DF31.7070904@intel.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:02:25 -0800 From: Scott Garman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: openssl 1.0? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:08:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, I wanted to get some feedback from the community about OpenSSL 1.0. We currently only support 0.9.8 in oe-core. Specifically: should we add openssl 1.0 to oe-core, and should the rest of our recipes build against it by default? I imagine if we add 1.0 we'll still want to keep the 0.9.8 around for some time. Thoughts? Scott -- Scott Garman Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project Intel Open Source Technology Center