From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtprelay-h22.telenor.se ([195.54.99.197]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RW83A-000193-Ta for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:55:49 +0100 Received: from ipb4.telenor.se (ipb4.telenor.se [195.54.127.167]) by smtprelay-h22.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F268E095 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 15:49:07 +0100 (CET) X-SENDER-IP: [83.227.56.19] X-LISTENER: [smtp.bredband.net] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArEcANeS105T4zgTPGdsb2JhbAAMMAirEQEBAQE3giQBAQEBAzhAEQsYCRYPCQMCAQIBMRQGDQgBAYgLuAKDbIQDgzEElFeSEw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,278,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="1767235375" Received: from c-1338e353.011-39-73746f12.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO [10.175.196.244]) ([83.227.56.19]) by ipb4.telenor.se with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2011 15:49:07 +0100 Message-ID: <4ED793E2.5070205@emagii.com> Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:49:06 +0100 From: Ulf Samuelsson Organization: eMagii User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <4ED0CC76.4040606@emagii.com> <1322579029.7964.0.camel@ted> <4ED54C2B.2060505@emagii.com> <4ED66835.3050400@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4ED66835.3050400@intel.com> Subject: Re: Feedback on building openembedded-core for qemuarm. Excerpts from buildlog X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: ulf@emagii.com, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:55:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2011-11-30 18:30, Scott Garman wrote: > On 11/29/2011 01:18 PM, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: >> >>>> Seen a couple of errors as well. >>>> >>>> 1. ERROR: Function 'useradd_sysroot' failed >>>> Tried to access "/etc/group" but this was locked. >>>> Problem disappeared the next time I rebuilt. >>> Can you file a bug about this problem please. I think we need to go >>> through the code paths in shadow and ensure its locking is sane. I took >>> a quick look at the code and was left wondering what lckpwdf() does for >>> example. Scott, could you take a look at this? >> >> Bugzilla is out of service, so bugs cannot be filed. > > I have filed a bug for this, and have been trying to reproduce it > without success: > > http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1794 > >> Haven't seen the issue since then so it is hard to give any details. >> I used very high BB_NUMBER_THREADS = 24. > > I do have access to a system with a lot of cores, and have been doing > builds on it. > > I'd just like to confirm that when you saw this, it was a build from > scratch (e.g, not using sstate cache from a previous build). And also, > you *weren't* building this from a remote filesystem (NFS), correct? > > Thanks, > > Scott > No NFS for sure. I think this was the first build, but only 99% sure. It disappered when I restarted the build. Have not seen this problem repeated, but then, the build on this machine has other problems Packages tend to fail since the c++ compiler seems to ignore "--sysroot" Machine = Ubuntu-11.10 x64. This is with BB_NUMBER_THREADS = "4" If I change this, then the same problem occur, but in a different package. (Tried with "4" AND "24") BR Ulf -- Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson eMagii