From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RWBbx-0001A4-8e for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:43:57 +0100 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2011 10:37:14 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="82179530" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.7.199.149]) ([10.7.199.149]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2011 10:37:14 -0800 Message-ID: <4ED7C95A.4060701@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:37:14 -0800 From: Joshua Lock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <48bd68cce53c87c7f9296a0a0ad5286efef7d5cc.1322594901.git.nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> <1322598026.3077.11.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <9DA5872FEF993D41B7173F58FCF6BE94E3D9E7EE@orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> <1322604347.3077.18.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <9DA5872FEF993D41B7173F58FCF6BE94E3D9E9B9@orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> <1322758679.26081.242.camel@phil-desktop> <1322759839.17484.141.camel@ted> <1791C583-61A2-4087-8250-255FA25DAB22@dominion.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: <1791C583-61A2-4087-8250-255FA25DAB22@dominion.thruhere.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gmp: also generate the libgmpcxx library & package it properly X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:43:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/12/11 09:26, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 1 dec. 2011, om 18:17 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > >> On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 16:57 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote: >>> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 14:51 -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: >>>> Thank you for the explanation. BTW where can I find official rules about signed-off-by line >>> >>> The "Signed-off-by" idiom originated with the kernel people and >>> Documentation/SubmittingPatches in the linux source tree contains a >>> fairly good description of what it means to them. >>> >>> I'm not sure that there are any official rules about its use in OE apart >>> from what's in the Commit Patch Message Guidelines (see the wiki). >> >> The yocto docs do mention what the specific meaning of the line is. > > But this is oe-core.. Shall we all agree it's the same for OE-core as well? Isn't that the standard mode? ;-) I expect folks have the same understanding as stated in the kernel and Yocto docs when using SOB - I see no reason for OE Core to introduce ambiguity. Joshua -- Joshua Lock Yocto Project "Johannes factotum" Intel Open Source Technology Centre