From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtprelay-h21.telenor.se ([195.54.99.196]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RWvur-0005iR-4P for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:10:33 +0100 Received: from ipb5.telenor.se (ipb5.telenor.se [195.54.127.168]) by smtprelay-h21.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E541C84F for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 21:03:46 +0100 (CET) X-SENDER-IP: [83.227.56.19] X-LISTENER: [smtp.bredband.net] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlAbAEiA2k5T4zgTPGdsb2JhbAAMMAiqRwEBAQE3giQBAQEBAzhAEQsYCRYPCQMCAQIBMRQGDQgBAYgLtTSDbYQDgzEElFySGQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,290,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="7432159" Received: from c-1338e353.011-39-73746f12.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO [10.175.196.242]) ([83.227.56.19]) by ipb5.telenor.se with ESMTP; 03 Dec 2011 21:03:45 +0100 Message-ID: <4EDA80A2.5070303@emagii.com> Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:03:46 +0100 From: Ulf Samuelsson Organization: eMagii User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ulf@emagii.com, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <4ED0CC76.4040606@emagii.com> <1322579029.7964.0.camel@ted> <4ED54C2B.2060505@emagii.com> <4ED66835.3050400@intel.com> <4ED793E2.5070205@emagii.com> In-Reply-To: <4ED793E2.5070205@emagii.com> Subject: Re: Feedback on building openembedded-core for qemuarm. Excerpts from buildlog X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: ulf@emagii.com, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 20:10:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2011-12-01 15:49, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > On 2011-11-30 18:30, Scott Garman wrote: >> On 11/29/2011 01:18 PM, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: >>> >>>>> Seen a couple of errors as well. >>>>> >>>>> 1. ERROR: Function 'useradd_sysroot' failed >>>>> Tried to access "/etc/group" but this was locked. >>>>> Problem disappeared the next time I rebuilt. >>>> Can you file a bug about this problem please. I think we need to go >>>> through the code paths in shadow and ensure its locking is sane. I >>>> took >>>> a quick look at the code and was left wondering what lckpwdf() does >>>> for >>>> example. Scott, could you take a look at this? >>> >>> Bugzilla is out of service, so bugs cannot be filed. >> >> I have filed a bug for this, and have been trying to reproduce it >> without success: >> >> http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1794 >> >>> Haven't seen the issue since then so it is hard to give any details. >>> I used very high BB_NUMBER_THREADS = 24. >> >> I do have access to a system with a lot of cores, and have been doing >> builds on it. >> >> I'd just like to confirm that when you saw this, it was a build from >> scratch (e.g, not using sstate cache from a previous build). And >> also, you *weren't* building this from a remote filesystem (NFS), >> correct? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Scott >> > No NFS for sure. > > I think this was the first build, but only 99% sure. > It disappered when I restarted the build. > > Have not seen this problem repeated, but then, the build on this > machine has other problems > > Packages tend to fail since the c++ compiler seems to ignore "--sysroot" > > Machine = Ubuntu-11.10 x64. > > This is with BB_NUMBER_THREADS = "4" > If I change this, then the same problem occur, but in a different > package. > (Tried with "4" AND "24") > Have made some further tests with the same machine, but now running Ubuntu 11.04 x64 bitbake console-image PARALLEL_TASKS BB_NUMBER_TASKS BUILD TIME 2 2 1:24:16 4 4 0:48:22 6 6 0:45:00 24 24 C++ compiler fails with --sysroot problem after ~2200 out of 2400 tasks. BR Ulf -- Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson eMagii