From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RYPB5-0002cV-HO for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:37:23 +0100 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2011 13:30:33 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="84046435" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.7.199.86]) ([10.7.199.86]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2011 13:30:29 -0800 Message-ID: <4EDFDAF5.2080901@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:30:29 -0800 From: Joshua Lock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <025adb591e6811bcd1bc5480d6c297015d373a02.1323286080.git.elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com> <38bec96fcbe89f8dc264c8889f69e4f5afff35ad.1323286080.git.elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com> <1323292609.4065.42.camel@mattotaupa> In-Reply-To: <1323292609.4065.42.camel@mattotaupa> Subject: Re: Abbreviation of OpenEmbedded-Core X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:37:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 07/12/11 13:16, Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear OE folks, OE-Core folks? > Am Mittwoch, den 07.12.2011, 11:34 -0800 schrieb Beth Flanagan: >> From: Elizabeth Flanagan >> >> This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses >> found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas: > > could we agree on the spelling of the abbreviation of OpenEmbedded-Core? > > In the files in the repository everything is spelled OE-Core so I guess > that should be it. The Wiki uses OE-Core [1] and Elisabeth’s commit > message uses OECore. I think we do have an accord here. Consistent usage in the 'code' and documentation emphasises that. What makes you think we don't agree? It's probably that Elizabeth's commit message was a typo. I certainly make enough of those. Regards, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Yocto Project "Johannes factotum" Intel Open Source Technology Centre